Man fails in claim CUMH discriminated against him over heel prick test for daughter

He believed he was being "purposefully assigned a lesser parenting role to his daughter than his partner" when he tried to get a heel-prick test for his infant
Man fails in claim CUMH discriminated against him over heel prick test for daughter

The man told the Workplace Relations Commission that Cork University Maternity Hospital staff had informed him that nobody could perform the test in circumstances where, in law, someone had not yet been made the legal guardian of the infant. Picture: Pexels

A man’s claim that Cork University Maternity Hospital discriminated against him because he was unmarried and a man has been rejected as “not well-founded”.

The Workplace Relations Commission made the ruling, despite having “sympathy” for the man who believed he was being "purposefully assigned a lesser parenting role to his daughter than his partner" when he tried to get a heel-prick test for his infant.

Already a subscriber? Sign in

You have reached your article limit.

Unlimited access. Half the price.

Annual €130 €65

Best value

Monthly €12€6 / month

More in this section

Lunchtime News

Newsletter

Keep up with stories of the day with our lunchtime news wrap and important breaking news alerts.

Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Brand Safety FAQ Help Contact Us Terms and Conditions

© Examiner Echo Group Limited