200 names linked to Jeffrey Epstein expected to be made public
Nearly 200 names connected to the Jeffrey Epstein-Ghislaine Maxwell sex trafficking conspiracy could be released by a New York judge as soon as Tuesday.
Nearly 200 names connected to the Jeffrey Epstein-Ghislaine Maxwell sex trafficking conspiracy could be released by a New York judge as soon as Tuesday, exposing or confirming the identities of dozens of associates of the disgraced financier that until now have only been known as John and Jane Does in court papers.
A deadline for objections to the unsealing of name passes at midnight on Monday, nearly nine years after victim Virginia Giuffre filed a single defamation claim against Maxwell, daughter of the late British press baron Robert Maxwell, in 2015, that in turn produced the names in legal depositions.
A year later, in 2016, US district court judge Robert Sweet rejected Maxwellâs motion to dismiss the case, finding that âthe veracity of a contextual world of facts more broad than the allegedly defamatory statementsâ and that Guiffre âwas a victim of sustained underage sexual abuse between 1999 and 2002â. The parties settled out of court in 2017.
From that wellspring came not only the names now set to be released, but a series of civil lawsuits including Guiffreâs action against Britainâs Prince Andrew for âsexual assault and intentional infliction of emotional distressâ that was settled out of court without admission of liability for a reported $12m. The prince has always strenuously denied any wrongdoing.
The defamation suit also set the stage for a federal sex trafficking case against Maxwell, who was found guilty on five of six charges, and sentenced to a 20-year prison sentence in December 2021.
But expectations that the release of the names from the ageing defamation suit could transfer to criminal charges are likely overblown. Epstein killed himself while awaiting trial in 2019, and after Maxwellâs conviction federal prosecutors made it clear that they considered their work done.
Still, US district judge Loretta Preskaâs 51-page order explaining her reasoning on whether to unseal or continue to redact the names of about 180 John and Jane Does offers will probably be a serious embarrassment to many high-profile figures.
Many on the list will already be publicly known as associates, employees of Epstein and Maxwell, or people who had flown on his planes. It may also name Epsteinâs alleged victims who had been taken to homes, including a mansion in New York, a Palm Beach villa, a private island in the US Virgin Islands and a ranch outside Santa Fe.
Its the names of the John Does that will be mostly scrutinized, and is almost certain to include a former US president, actors, academics and, notoriously, the now reclusive British prince.
According to ABC News on Monday, âJane Doe 162â is a witness who testified she was 17 when she was with Andrew, Maxwell and Giuffre at Epsteinâs home in New York mansion.
Former US president Bill Clinton was identified by ANC News as âDoe 36â and is mentioned in more than 50 of the redacted filings, according to court records. Giuffre made no allegations of wrongdoing by Clinton, but maintains she met him on the island â which Clinton has said he never visited.
But personal flight logs kept by one of Epsteinâs pilots showed that Clinton flew extensively on Epsteinâs plane, including on trips to Paris, Bangkok and Brunei in the years after he left office in 2001.
According to ABC, Giuffreâs lawyers contacted Clintonâs legal representatives about a deposition but they responded that his testimony would not be helpful. Maxwellâs lawyers also rejected the idea, calling it a âtransparent ploy by Guiffre to increase media exposure for her sensational stories through deposition side-showâ.
But Clintonâs name repeatedly came up in connection with Epstein, including in a New York magazine article in 2002 in which he said through a spokesman that Epstein was âboth a highly successful financier and a committed philanthropist with a keen sense of global markets and an in-depth knowledge of 21st-century scienceâ.
- Guardian



