No evidence police leaked Denis Donaldson information before murder: Ombudsman
Denis Donaldson was murdered in 2006 (Paul Faith/PA)
There is no evidence that police leaked information about the whereabouts of a former Sinn Féin member who was unmasked as an informant before he was murdered, a watchdog report has said.
Denis Donaldson was shot dead at a remote cottage in Donegal in April 2006, in a killing claimed by the Real IRA.
Police Ombudsman Marie Anderson found that the PSNI had not sought to implicate members of Mr Donaldsonâs family in his murder, and said that rather than impeding the investigation of his murder by the GardaĂ, the PSNI had provided âa high level of co-operation and assistanceâ.
However, she stated that the PSNI should have carried out a further risk assessment of any potential threats to Mr Donaldsonâs life following the publication of a media article which included photographs of him outside the cottage just over two weeks before he was murdered.
Reacting, Mr Donaldsonâs family slammed a âflagrant breach of Denisâs Article 2 right to life and the PSNIâs duty of care to himâ.
Mrs Andersonâs report deals with police actions before and after his murder.
On March 17, 2002, sensitive information was stolen during a burglary at Castlereagh police station, and police received intelligence that the Provisional IRA was responsible.
After documentation was recovered from Mr Donaldsonâs home, he was charged along with three others of possession material which could be of use to terrorists.
Charges against one of the four were withdrawn in December 2003, and the case against the others was withdrawn by the Public Prosecution Service in November 2005.
The report said that police then carried out a risk assessment which concluded that the PIRA would be likely to conduct an internal inquiry to establish why the case had collapsed.
On December 10, 2005, police delivered a threat message to Mr Donaldson, which stated that âmembers of the media believe that Denis Donaldson is an informantâ.
The report said because of concern that he may be at risk, the PSNI held an urgent âGold Commandâ meeting on December 14, resulting in police resources being put on stand-by so that, if necessary, they could respond quickly to developing events.
The following day, the report stated, an officer referred to as âPolice Officer 3â called Mr Donaldson on the phone twice and spoke to him briefly on the second occasion, providing him with a contact number.
At about 9.20pm, a call was made to the number given to Mr Donaldson earlier, but Police Officer 3 did not recognise the number as belonging to Mr Donaldson and did not answer the call.
The following day then president of Sinn Féin Gerry Adams held a press conference in Dublin during which he announced that Mr Donaldson had been dismissed from the party after admitting that he had been an informant.
Mr Donaldson made a statement later the same day stating that he âhad worked for British Intelligence and RUC/PSNI Special Branchâ since the 1980s.
He later moved to a cottage near Glenties in County Donegal, where he was murdered.
Mr Donaldsonâs family expressed a number of concerns about police actions, including an allegation that a threat message delivered to Mr Donaldson on December 10 2005 was âbogusâ and âartificially manufacturedâ as it was untrue that the media were intending to expose him as an informant.
The family voiced concern that the message was âmaliciously releasedâ, and alleged that police had failed to conduct a risk assessment before delivering the message.
However, Mrs Anderson said the threat message was based on âreliable information from a credible sourceâ.
She said her investigators had examined a clear audit trail, including a risk assessment and contingency plans, setting out the rationale for the decision by police to deliver the threat message.
She said: âI am of the view that police would have failed in their Article 2 obligations if they had not informed him of the relevant information.â
The family also alleged that the phone call made to Mr Donaldson on December 15 was intended to âspookâ him and part of an exercise to âburnâ him as an informant.
But Mrs Anderson said it was âpart of a carefully considered threat management plan in response to information that Mr Donaldson had informed Sinn FĂ©in colleagues that he was an informantâ.
She added: âThe purpose of these telephone calls was to identify, assess, and manage any identified risks, as well as address any welfare concerns relating to Mr Donaldson. I have identified no concerns regarding these telephone calls.â
She said that the decision by police not to take the call made to Police Officer 3 on the evening of December 15 was âreasonable and prudentâ given that it was not made from Mr Donaldsonâs phone.
Another concern expressed by Mr Donaldsonâs family was that, after he had moved to Donegal, police had leaked information about his whereabouts to a number of people, including journalists.
On March 19 2006, a newspaper published a story which described the cottage he was living in as ârun downâ, without running water and electricity and adjacent to other cottages in a bend in the road.
Mrs Anderson said her investigation had found no evidence that police had leaked any information about Mr Donaldsonâs whereabouts.
However, she said the publication of information about where he was living should have prompted police to conduct a further risk assessment to identify any risks he might have been exposed to.
She said: âPSNI advised AGS (An Garda SĂochĂĄna) of the potential increased risk to Mr Donaldson as a result of the media article.
âHowever, my investigators found no evidence that a further risk assessment took place or was considered by the PSNI.â
She added that she had found no evidence that PSNI had monitored Mr Donaldsonâs movements or conversations after he moved to Donegal, as alleged by his family.
The Police Ombudsmanâs investigation examined concerns that the PSNI had sought to implicate members of Mr Donaldsonâs family in his murder, but found no evidence.
The family also alleged that the PSNI had impeded AGSâs murder investigation by withholding, suppressing or editing information about their contact with him during the final months of his life.
However, Mrs Anderson said her investigation had found âno evidence that any member of the PSNI sought to impede the murder investigation conducted by AGSâ.
A spokesperson for the Donaldson family said: âFor reasons that remain unexplained, and unaccounted for, it is reported that the PSNI abandoned its routine practice of risk assessments which had apparently followed Denisâs exposure in December 2005.
âThis course of action was taken at precisely the moment when the risk to Denisâs life was at its greatest. This is a flagrant breach of Denisâs Article 2 right to life and the PSNIâs duty of care to him.
âThere were repeated attempts to close down this inquiry. The key question has always been: did the PSNI do enough to protect Denisâs life. The Ombudsmanâs answer today was: no, they did not.
âNo-one has any comprehension of the direct harm and damage to our family caused by the actions and omissions of certain police officers, and others, over the last 16 years.â
PSNI Assistant Chief Constable Mark McEwan said: âI recognise the pain and suffering felt by the family of Denis Donaldson.
âWe note the findings of the Ombudsmanâs investigation and will now take some time to review her comprehensive report.
âWe have reviewed our operational policies and service procedure regarding the management of threats to life, and will continue to do so on a regular basis.â




