Student cites lack of parking in challenge to shared living development on Dublin pub site

Plans for a 198-unit, build-to-rent, shared living development in Castleknock, Dublin, have been challenged in the High Court.

Student cites lack of parking in challenge to shared living development on Dublin pub site

Plans for a 198-unit, build-to-rent, shared living development in Castleknock, Dublin, have been challenged in the High Court.

Bartra Property (Castleknock) Ltd got planning permission from Bord Pleanála last January for the development, which will contain 210 beds and two car park spaces, on the site of Brady's Castleknock Inn on the Old Navan Road.

Brady's is currently still operating as a pub but would be demolished to make way for this project, the court heard.

Barry O'Lone, a student who lives with his family across the road from Brady's, is concerned that with only two car park spaces, the development will cause "a severe strain on the area" with regard to car parking.

While the O'Lone home has a driveway, they also avail of the current on-street parking outside the house as do visitors, he says in an affidavit.

He also says the residential amenity and value of their home will be adversely affected.

Today, Mr O'Lone's lawyers were granted leave, following a one-side only represented application, to seek to quash the board's decision granting permission.

Bartra Property is a notice party. The case comes back in May.

In his challenge, Mr O'Lone claims the board appears to have based its decision on Government guidelines for new apartments. It is claimed there is no evidence to suggest the Brady's site is within an "urban area" and the only evidence is that it is within a "suburban area".

The guidelines make it clear that shared accommodation is appropriate for city centre locations and/or core urban locations. Neither of these apply to the Brady's site, it is claimed.

It is further claimed the board did not have jurisdiction to deal with it as a strategic housing development.

Mr O'Lone also says the decision was irrational, flew in the face of common sense, contravened the local development plan and took irrelevant considerations into account.

The board erred in holding that the existence of Blanchardstown Hospital justified granting permission, he says. The hospital is "remote from the site" and there is not any proper and/or safe means of accessing it by bike or foot, it is claimed.

Mr Justice Charles Meenan, in granting leave to bring judicial review proceedings, said an application to seek a stay on any works could be made with 48 hours' notice.

More in this section

Text header

From florist to fraudster, leaving a trail of destruction from North Cork, to Waterford, to Clare, to Wexford and through the midlands ... learn how mistress of re-invention, Catherine O'Brien, scammed her way around rural Ireland.

War_map
Execution Time: 0.206 s