Robinson denies knowing of wife's dealings with teenage lover

The North’s beleaguered First Minister was attempting to clear his name tonight after insisting he did not know of his wife’s irregular financial dealings with her teenage lover.

The North’s beleaguered First Minister was attempting to clear his name tonight after insisting he did not know of his wife’s irregular financial dealings with her teenage lover.

Peter Robinson, the Democratic Unionist leader, ordered an official inquiry into his conduct on discovering his MP wife Iris had secured £50,000 (€55,000) from two wealthy developers to help her 19-year-old toyboy set up a restaurant business in south Belfast.

As well as the illicit affair, he claimed she had also concealed the nature of the donations she obtained.

“I had no information,” he said. “Absolutely no information about that, nor of any of the other financial arrangements, which is hardly surprising if somebody is hiding an affair from you, it’s probably not a surprise they are hiding the other arrangements relating to that affair.”

The East Belfast MP faced calls to resign or consider his future amid heightening unease and deep disquiet within his own ranks following claims that he failed to alert the authorities that Mrs Robinson did not declare her monetary interest in her lover’s Kirk McCambley’s restaurant – even though she was a member of the council that gave him the go-ahead to open in 2008.

Already under pressure from rival unionists going into the general election, some senior DUP members fear the leader might not survive this crisis and the sex and money scandal involving his troubled wife. She is quitting politics because of severe depression and has not been seen since Christmas.

Mr McCambley, 21, refused to comment at his business on the banks of the River Lagan.

But Mr Robinson came out fighting tonight, ordering civil servants to call in senior lawyers to probe his actions.

At the office of the DUP headquarters in his East Belfast constituency he said: “I have consistently indicated that I have done nothing wrong, that I acted properly.

“But me believing that and saying it in my view is not sufficient because I am being, if you like, tried by the press and therefore I think that we need to have an investigation.”

Asked what he would do if the lawyers did find he had breached ministerial codes, he said: “If there is (a breach) I will have to clearly and publicly indicate that is so and that clearly will mean there are consequences that I have to consider ... in regard to my position.”

Tonight it emerged that Mr Robinson’s partner at the head of the powersharing government, Sinn Féin’s Martin McGuinness, has also requested that officials seek legal opinion on the allegations.

The scandal has broken with the Executive already destabilised by the ongoing rift between the DUP and Sinn Féin over delays in devolving policing powers to the region.

A Sinn Féin source said: “Martin McGuinness is very concerned by the issues raised in last night’s (television) programme. This morning he requested a legal opinion to be prepared by the departmental solicitor’s office concerning any implications for the operations of the OFMDFM.”

Strangford MP Mrs Robinson issued a statement this week admitting the affair and revealing that, wracked by guilt, she had tried to take her own life in March last year.

But last night a TV documentary added explosive claims not only about the nature of her sexual relationship with Mr McCambley, but also on her financial dealings with him.

Though conceding his wife’s “irrational behaviour” had caused embarrassment, Mr Robinson said he had been kept in the dark about the nature of the £50,000 when he found out about it in December 2008.

As far as he was concerned, she was simply trying to get a young man to pay back money he owed to two developers.

He said when he discovered she intended to get the money returned through her initially, he said he insisted it was given directly to the developers through solicitors.

“There were elements of the Spotlight investigation that came as a shock to me,” he said.

“There were matters that I had not heard about before, detail in relation to my wife’s affair that I had not been aware of, matters relating to the financial arrangement about which I knew nothing.”

Mrs Robinson and Mr McCambley, now 21, first became close after she comforted him following the death of his father, Billy, an east Belfast butcher who was a family friend. They started a sexual relationship in the summer of 2008.

Castlereagh Borough Council today launched an investigation into the issues raised by the documentary.

Although Mr Fraser and Mr Campbell were family friends, Mr Robinson said the first he heard about the money was when his wife was attempting to get it paid back while on a family holiday in Florida.

“By the time I heard one of those friends had died the other has indicated to me that he was approached much on the basis that this was someone she was helping following the death of his father, that he deserved a chance in life and was he prepared to give some assistance to start him up in business and the cheque was made out directly to the individual concerned and also that this was a matter between themselves.”

The First Minister also denied knowledge of the £5,000 cash payment his wife had allegedly taken from the original £50,000.

He went on to accuse the media of attempting to draw him into the issue on the basis of innuendo and did not rule out taking legal action.

When asked whether he believed his wife should have declared an interest in the business, he said: “I am not going to step in and usurp her legal rights.”

The DUP leader revealed that his wife was too unwell to even answer the allegations levelled at her.

“I am not even in the position where I can question my wife about these issues,” he said.

“Neither her solicitor or I would be confident about the responses we are getting to any questions.”

The MP also hit out at any suggestion that his wife was overstating the seriousness of her illness.

Mr Robinson said he was calling for the legal opinion because any potential defamation case would take years to complete while expected probes by parliamentary watchdogs would take months.

x

More in this section

Lunchtime News

Newsletter

Get a lunch briefing straight to your inbox at noon daily. Also be the first to know with our occasional Breaking News emails.

Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Brand Safety FAQ Help Contact Us Terms and Conditions

© Examiner Echo Group Limited