No constitutional time limit on education, trial hears

The Supreme Court has been told that there is nothing in the constitution which puts a time limit on the provision of primary education.

The Supreme Court has been told that there is nothing in the constitution which puts a time limit on the provision of primary education.

Lawyer Dermot Gleeson, acting on behalf of Mrs Catherine Sinnott, is challenging a proposal by the State that free primary education should cease at the age of 18.

You have reached your article limit. Already a subscriber? Sign in

Unlimited access starts here.

Try from only €0.25 a day.

Cancel anytime

More in this section

Lunchtime News

Newsletter

Get a lunch briefing straight to your inbox at noon daily. Also be the first to know with our occasional Breaking News emails.

Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Brand Safety FAQ Help Contact Us Terms and Conditions

© Examiner Echo Group Limited