Surveillance was ‘oppressive’
Mr Wilson said he stood over his view the surveillance of Mr Bailey was “oppressive” and he disagreed with the State that this was not surveillance but observation.
When Luán Ó Braonáin, counsel for the State, said Mr Bailey remains a “person of interest” in relation to the investigation, Mr Wilson said he believed Mr Bailey and his partner Jules Thomas were subject to a level of surveillance reserved for active criminal offenders.
