Man posed as teen girl online to exploit boys
The 21-year-old, who was 19 at the time, convinced three boys aged between 13 and 14, to send him sexually explicit pictures of themselves and to masturbate via an online video link.
He later told gardaí he did not think there was anything wrong with what he was doing and that he did it to explore his sexuality.
Judge Mary Ellen Ring previously said she would deal with the issue of publishing the man’s identity yesterday, but the case was adjourned as she was not available to finalise it.
She had remanded him in custody and ordered him to undergo further risk assessment by the Probation Services at the last hearing.
Yesterday, Judge Martin Nolan at Dublin Circuit Criminal Court adjourned the case to later this month. The man’s senior counsel, Padraig Dwyer, said his client was due to be arraigned on similar offences committed during the same time period.
Mr Dwyer requested that Judge Ring deal with both cases for sentence on October 29.
Judge Nolan remanded the man in continuing custody until that date.
The Dublin man pleaded guilty to three charges of exploitation of a child and two counts of defilement of a child at locations in Dublin on various dates between April and October 2012.
Mr Dwyer said his client is a young man with a full-time job who has no previous convictions and who has not offended since.
Judge Ring previously said details of fake social networking accounts used by him should not be published. Two accounts were set up as those of a 14-year-old girl and a 14-year-old bisexual boy. They used actual images of children randomly sourced through Google images.
Detective Garda David Nolan told Fiona Murphy, prosecuting, that in March 2012 the man set up the two false Facebook profiles and sent out random friend requests to males aged around 13 and 14. Judge Ring described this as a “fishing expedition”.
The man said he targeted these other users by searching random names and adding in those he liked or thought were “nice-looking”.
He denied their ages were relevant or that the age on the fake account was designed to attract young teenagers. Around 350 people accepted the friend requests sent from the two fake accounts.
The offender then began sending them private messages, which began normally but would become more sexual.
In one case, he convinced a 14-year-old boy, who has Asperger’s Syndrome, to talk about his underwear and to later masturbate on a web-cam. The victim believed he was communicating with a 14-year-old girl.
The man asked this victim if he would “do stuff on camera” with his 10-year-old brother but the victim refused. He then asked the victim to masturbate on camera and the victim did this.
In another case, the man, again posing as a girl, received sexually explicit images from a 13-year-old boy and later threatened to publish them on Facebook if he didn’t send more.
Posing as a bisexual teenage boy, the man also began exchanging sexually explicit messages with a 14-year-old boy. When this victim suggested that he would be willing to sexually engage with a 20-year-old, the man contacted the victim using his real identity.
The man told the teenager he was aged 17 and they met twice and engaged in sexual acts.
He said the victim had suggested doing some things and added: “We both agreed and nobody was forced.” He said he was a teenager and didn’t consider himself an adult.
The offences came to light when the mother of the first victim checked her son’s iPad and saw the explicit conversations with the fake girl.
