Promissory note law ‘so general it could be limitless’

An emergency law giving the minister for finance power to spend “possibly limitless” sums of public money supporting financial institutions via promissory notes was so general it could mean the minister intended to “save a village credit union or Anglo”, the High Court has heard.

Promissory note law ‘so general it could be limitless’

The minister was given “carte blanche” by the Credit Institutions Financial Support Act 2008 to act as he chose and not told, for example, whether he should consider whether such institutions were insolvent, said John Rogers SC.

“All the act says is there is a financial crisis, deal with it, and the way to deal with it is to throw money at it,” said Mr Rogers.

The act was unconstitutional because it delegated the Dáil’s power to appropriate public monies for expenditure without setting limits on the amounts to be given to institutions or specifying any clear principles and policies governing the exercise of that power.

Mr Rogers was making submissions on behalf of United Left TD Joan Collins in her challenge to the legality of promissory notes made in favour of Anglo Irish Bank, the Educational Building Society, and Irish Nationwide Building Society as part of the State’s €31bn capitalisation of the institutions.

The notes, made under section 6 of the 2008 act, were unlawful because they involved the minister “appropriating” public monies for expenditure when, under the Constitution, that was solely a matter for the Dáil, the TD contends. The State rejects her claims.

The case continues today, when the State is due to begin its submissions.

More in this section

Lunchtime News

Newsletter

Keep up with stories of the day with our lunchtime news wrap and important breaking news alerts.

Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Brand Safety FAQ Help Contact Us Terms and Conditions

© Examiner Echo Group Limited