Supreme Court reserves judgment over refusal to restrain Mahon hearing
Opening the appeal at the Supreme Court yesterday Counsel for Fitzwilton Paul Gallagher SC said that the Tribunal “cannot proceed” with a public hearing on this matter because this would be in breach of its terms of reference, amended in December 2004.
Fitzwilton contends those terms required the Tribunal to stipulate in writing what matters would go to public hearing by May 1, 2005, and claimed the Fitzwilton payment was not so stipulated. In his judgment last December, Mr Justice Kevin Feeney said the court was satisfied that a tribunal document of April 28, 2005, was clearly a written record of the decision taken by members of the tribunal listing additional matters to proceed to public hearing.