Gwyneth Paltrow causing ski collision is most likely scenario, US court told

Gwyneth Paltrow colliding with a man from behind on a ski slope and falling on top of him is the âonly scenarioâ that would explain his injuries, a US court has heard.
Terry Sanderson provided âa cushionâ for the Oscar-winning actress during the incident at the Deer Valley resort in Utah in 2016, jurors were told.
The retired optometrist is suing Ms Paltrow over the crash, in which he suffered several broken ribs and a severe concussion.
Ms Paltrow has denied the claim and is counter-suing Mr Sanderson, alleging it was him that caused the collision.
Both are expected to provide testimony at the trial on Friday.
On Thursday jurors heard testimony from Dr Richard Boehne, who said Mr Sandersonâs injuries could only have been caused by being struck from behind.
âHe was hit by someone from the side and from behind, bear in mind that person landed on him. People who fall donât get rib fractures⊠it takes something else,â he said.
âIf you had a choice between Mr Sanderson hitting Ms Paltrow or Ms Paltrow hitting Mr Sanderson, you would have to pick Ms Paltrow hitting Mr Sanderson from behind and falling on top of him to account for the rib fractures.â

âIf you were to compare two scenarios⊠thereâs only one scenario that would account for enough force application to fracture those ribs and that would be Ms Paltrow striking Mr Sanderson from behind and falling to the ground.
âIn essence he was like a cushion, if you will.â
Dr Boehne added that he had considered a ânumber of different scenariosâ when coming to his conclusion.
Earlier, the court heard testimony from Mr Sandersonâs daughter, Polly Sanderson-Grasham.
Ms Sanderson-Grasham said her father had been a âfun-loving, gregariousâ man prior to the incident, describing him as a âgoerâ and a âreal positive influenceâ, as well as an experienced skier.
But she said seeing him at her own daughterâs graduation around three months after the skiing crash had been like a âslap in the faceâ.
âI felt like âwowâ. There was a moment when I almost expected drool to come out of his mouth,â she said.
âHe wasnât engaged with anyone⊠that was my first slap in the face that something is terribly wrong.â
She added that her father could now not âsee the forest for the treesâ and got stuck âin the minutiaeâ of things.
âHeâs easily frustrated, he gets agitated, angry â I didnât have memory of him being an angry person but heâs got a pretty short fuse these days,â she said.
âI think heâs just a little more cautious, not as confident â heâs in a really negative place and thatâs hard for me as his daughter.â

Ms Sanderson-Grasham later became emotional, telling the court: âI hope that (my father) moves on. I hope that weâre able to put this very strange chapter behind us.
âWe donât always choose the doors we walk through but we can choose how we walk through them. We have a lot of healing to do.â
Jurors also heard from neuropsychologist Dr Alina Fong, who said that when she first met Mr Sanderson in 2017, he had presented âa myriadâ of symptoms indicative of having suffered a concussion.
Dr Fong said there was no evidence âwhatsoeverâ that Mr Sanderson was âfakingâ his injuries and he had been âan ideal patientâ.
The defence is seeking damages of a minimum of 300,000 dollars (ÂŁ244,000), while Ms Paltrowâs counter-claim is for one dollar.
The trial, taking place in Park City, Utah, continues.