Gwyneth Paltrow causing ski collision is most likely scenario, US court told
Gwyneth Paltrow colliding with a man from behind on a ski slope and falling on top of him is the āonly scenarioā that would explain his injuries, a US court has heard.
Terry Sanderson provided āa cushionā for the Oscar-winning actress during the incident at the Deer Valley resort in Utah in 2016, jurors were told.
The retired optometrist is suing Ms Paltrow over the crash, in which he suffered several broken ribs and a severe concussion.
Ms Paltrow has denied the claim and is counter-suing Mr Sanderson, alleging it was him that caused the collision.
Both are expected to provide testimony at the trial on Friday.
On Thursday jurors heard testimony from Dr Richard Boehne, who said Mr Sandersonās injuries could only have been caused by being struck from behind.
āHe was hit by someone from the side and from behind, bear in mind that person landed on him. People who fall donāt get rib fractures⦠it takes something else,ā he said.
āIf you had a choice between Mr Sanderson hitting Ms Paltrow or Ms Paltrow hitting Mr Sanderson, you would have to pick Ms Paltrow hitting Mr Sanderson from behind and falling on top of him to account for the rib fractures.ā
āIf you were to compare two scenarios⦠thereās only one scenario that would account for enough force application to fracture those ribs and that would be Ms Paltrow striking Mr Sanderson from behind and falling to the ground.
āIn essence he was like a cushion, if you will.ā
Dr Boehne added that he had considered a ānumber of different scenariosā when coming to his conclusion.
Earlier, the court heard testimony from Mr Sandersonās daughter, Polly Sanderson-Grasham.
Ms Sanderson-Grasham said her father had been a āfun-loving, gregariousā man prior to the incident, describing him as a āgoerā and a āreal positive influenceā, as well as an experienced skier.
But she said seeing him at her own daughterās graduation around three months after the skiing crash had been like a āslap in the faceā.
āI felt like āwowā. There was a moment when I almost expected drool to come out of his mouth,ā she said.
āHe wasnāt engaged with anyone⦠that was my first slap in the face that something is terribly wrong.ā
She added that her father could now not āsee the forest for the treesā and got stuck āin the minutiaeā of things.
āHeās easily frustrated, he gets agitated, angry ā I didnāt have memory of him being an angry person but heās got a pretty short fuse these days,ā she said.
āI think heās just a little more cautious, not as confident ā heās in a really negative place and thatās hard for me as his daughter.ā
Ms Sanderson-Grasham later became emotional, telling the court: āI hope that (my father) moves on. I hope that weāre able to put this very strange chapter behind us.
āWe donāt always choose the doors we walk through but we can choose how we walk through them. We have a lot of healing to do.ā
Jurors also heard from neuropsychologist Dr Alina Fong, who said that when she first met Mr Sanderson in 2017, he had presented āa myriadā of symptoms indicative of having suffered a concussion.
Dr Fong said there was no evidence āwhatsoeverā that Mr Sanderson was āfakingā his injuries and he had been āan ideal patientā.
The defence is seeking damages of a minimum of 300,000 dollars (Ā£244,000), while Ms Paltrowās counter-claim is for one dollar.
The trial, taking place in Park City, Utah, continues.
