Sponsors’ influence: Second chances

For many years there has been a concern that industry, through the research grants offered to universities, unduly influences those institutions.

It seems that commercial influence may have tightened its grip on sport too. Ulster Rugby insists the decision to sack Paddy Jackson and Stuart Olding was not driven by money but it is hard to imagine that Ulster Rugby, or any organisation like it, might feel absolutely free to bite a hand that feeds it.

The decision seemed an open question until the Bank of Ireland, expressed justified unhappiness with being linked with degrading, offensive behaviour.

That an organisation that recently needed a slice of a €70bn rescue fund because of its own recklessness should take the high moral ground raises interesting questions.

It also makes another question unavoidable — if the banks were allowed, without any real sanction, to remake themselves and regain such influence, why can’t Paddy Jackson and Stuart Olding get a second chance too at an appropriate time?


Related Articles

Man convicted for naming ‘rape’ complainant on social media

Court hears Stuart Olding offered no evidence of financial hardship in legal costs bid

Stuart Olding says 'ineptitude' by NI's Prosecution Service cost him chance to play rugby in Ireland

Belfast rugby rape trial ‘helped public better understand court process’

More in this Section

Across Europe, populists and right-wing parties seek power

Trump’s week to forget a sign of things to come

Global instability: No countries for old democracies

Social media a pied piper leading users to latest cause célèbre


Lifestyle

7 of the most head-scratching crimes of fashion committed in 2018

Child’s love for Mary Poppins: UK children's Laureate breaks down the iconic nanny's reboot

Stepping out of the shade: Choose colour for this years festive partywear

More From The Irish Examiner