Referendum booklet increased yes vote, says advertising expert

An advertising expert has told the High Court he believes the Government’s information campaign in the children’s referendum exerted a “significant emotional influence” on voter behaviour, encouraging people to think children were at risk and they should vote yes.

Joanna Jordan has brought proceedings aimed at overturning the result of the children's referendum. Picture: Courtpix

Robert Heath said the use on the government booklet’s cover of a silhouette image of three children, slogans such as “protecting children” and the title “children’s referendum” would have had an emotional impact on some recipients of the booklet encouraging a yes vote.

The use of the phrase “children’s referendum”, rather than “children referendum” as used by the Referendum Commission, implied the referendum was being run by children on their own behalf, he said.

The emotional impact was added to by the silhouette image of three children holding hands which suggested they were defenceless “lost waifs” in need of protection, he said. The use of phrases such as “protecting children” implied the referendum was necessary on behalf of children “to correct a deficit”.

He concluded that the booklet and a print advertisement showed a “strong bias” in favour of a yes vote, partly by mentioning little if anything about the status quo or what would happen if a yes vote was not passed. The department’s TV ad for the referendum, shown to the court, showed a “slight bias” in favour of a yes vote, he also concluded.

Mr Heath, of the University of Bath, gave evidence in the proceedings by Joanna Jordan, of St Kevin’s Villas, Gleangeary Rd Upper, Dún Laoghaire, Co Dublin, aimed at overturning the referendum result. The amendment passed on Nov 10, 2012, by a margin of 58% to 41%.

The court yesterday heard details of a poll of 2,012 people carried out by Behaviour & Attitudes for the Referendum Commission in the weeks after the vote. The survey asked people about receiving the government booklet, distributed to about 2m homes.

In his report, Mr Heath conc-luded from the Behaviour & Attitudes poll figures that receiving the booklet increased the proportion of those voting yes while not receiving it increased the proportion of those voting no.

He also noted about 9% of those who did not receive the booklet refused to say how they voted. If all of those were embarrassed to admit they voted no, the proportion of the no vote among those not receiving the Government booklet would have been 49%, almost half the total vote, concluded Mr Heath.

The hearing continues next Tuesday.

© Irish Examiner Ltd. All rights reserved

More in this Section

Carer grandparents feel taken for granted: study

Kerry driver guilty of crash perjury

Homeless man with trust fund seeks further €4,500

Former hospice chief loses case against ‘Irish Examiner’


You might also like

Breaking Stories

TG4 opinion poll in Donegal shows FF may thwart SF’s Dáil hopes

Gardaí appeal for information on cars believed to be used in Eddie Hutch attack

Transatlantic flight diverted to Dublin Airport

David Drumm expected to drop fight against extradition

Lifestyle

How engaged are the Irish abroad in the upcoming general election

MAKING CENTS: Focus on the rate when shopping for a mortgage

The Survivalist: The Irish sci-fi about to hit the big screen

Chinese New Year: In the year of the monkey

More From The Irish Examiner