Referendum booklet increased yes vote, says advertising expert

An advertising expert has told the High Court he believes the Government’s information campaign in the children’s referendum exerted a “significant emotional influence” on voter behaviour, encouraging people to think children were at risk and they should vote yes.

Joanna Jordan has brought proceedings aimed at overturning the result of the children's referendum. Picture: Courtpix

Robert Heath said the use on the government booklet’s cover of a silhouette image of three children, slogans such as “protecting children” and the title “children’s referendum” would have had an emotional impact on some recipients of the booklet encouraging a yes vote.

The use of the phrase “children’s referendum”, rather than “children referendum” as used by the Referendum Commission, implied the referendum was being run by children on their own behalf, he said.

The emotional impact was added to by the silhouette image of three children holding hands which suggested they were defenceless “lost waifs” in need of protection, he said. The use of phrases such as “protecting children” implied the referendum was necessary on behalf of children “to correct a deficit”.

He concluded that the booklet and a print advertisement showed a “strong bias” in favour of a yes vote, partly by mentioning little if anything about the status quo or what would happen if a yes vote was not passed. The department’s TV ad for the referendum, shown to the court, showed a “slight bias” in favour of a yes vote, he also concluded.

Mr Heath, of the University of Bath, gave evidence in the proceedings by Joanna Jordan, of St Kevin’s Villas, Gleangeary Rd Upper, Dún Laoghaire, Co Dublin, aimed at overturning the referendum result. The amendment passed on Nov 10, 2012, by a margin of 58% to 41%.

The court yesterday heard details of a poll of 2,012 people carried out by Behaviour & Attitudes for the Referendum Commission in the weeks after the vote. The survey asked people about receiving the government booklet, distributed to about 2m homes.

In his report, Mr Heath conc-luded from the Behaviour & Attitudes poll figures that receiving the booklet increased the proportion of those voting yes while not receiving it increased the proportion of those voting no.

He also noted about 9% of those who did not receive the booklet refused to say how they voted. If all of those were embarrassed to admit they voted no, the proportion of the no vote among those not receiving the Government booklet would have been 49%, almost half the total vote, concluded Mr Heath.

The hearing continues next Tuesday.

© Irish Examiner Ltd. All rights reserved

More in this Section

Simon Harris hopes to convince GPs of move to rural areas

Netflix re-telling of The Siege of Jadotville reveals strong Kerry links

Man died after choking incident in nursing home dining room, inquest hears.

Course helps separated couples to co-parent


Breaking Stories

Defence for Joan Burton false imprisonment accused say charge is against human rights

Irish person with blood cancer first in world to take part in new drug trial

95% of gardai prepared to strike over pay - ballot

Irishman Ibrahim Halawa writes from imprisonment about his graduation day

Lifestyle

Why Ireland's gay community will always be grateful to Fair City

City in song and verse - new anthology shows off the best of Cork writing

Angelina Jolie hiring the best divorce lawyer in the business - Laura Alison Wasser

Get your house in order before going for a mortgage

More From The Irish Examiner