One thing farmers can do is become more efficient with work practices
Thursday, July 26, 2012
By Mike Donovan
Nearly 3,000 dairy farmers attended the recent SOS Milk Summit in London to express their frustration and anger over milk prices.
With the Dairy Crest UK giant here in the UK posting a first quarter financial loss on its processing activities, and other dairy companies faring no better, there’s a squeeze on farm gate milk prices, and pain for dairy farmers.
In London, they laid into the minister, Jim Paice. He used to be a farm manager, and he knows the problems from the farmer viewpoint, but his hands are tied by the competing forces of food costs and inflation versus the demands and needs of farmers. So he said what he thought was sensible, encouraging the farmers to look at costs and herd management.
This was greeted with a howl of derision from the crowd, which was then whipped to their feet by chairman Meurig Raymond, the NFU’s deputy president, who shouted that “enough was enough”, pointing the finger of blame at the hapless government minister. Interesting that in this mood of anger nobody asked what the union had been doing.
Yet, the one thing that farmers can do is get more efficient. It requires no legislation or public investment.
Reducing farm costs also happens to be the working brief of Practical Farm Ideas, where I can show dairy farmers how one man has contained the mastitis problem in his commercial herd of 130 cows.
Mastitis incidence has been zero, and a cell count of 130 is achieved, by cluster rinsing with a home-made back-flush system which involved spending £1,300.
Mastitis hits 25% of cows each year, bringing a heavy cost on some dairy farms.
The Northern Ireland Department of Agriculture reports that 25% of milking cows get clinical mastitis each year, and each new case costs £180, or £5,000 for a 1,000-cow herd.
What would you say to a 130-cow farmer who has zero cases a year? Ten years ago, Wyn Williams introduced cluster dipping between cows, because he was convinced mastitis was largely transmitted by the milk liner.
He dipped and soaked clusters between cows in a 2% dilute hypochlorite solution. Mastitis and cell counts dropped dramatically, so he kept doing it for five or more years. He then built a new parlour, and believed the dipping was no longer necessary, because the parlour was new, but cases and cell count started to rise, so the routine was resumed, and mastitis declined again.
As herd size increased, the need to get cows through the parlour faster became more important, so Wyn designed and built a back-flush system which does all the units on one side of the parlour at the time.
He had the system up and running after spending £1,300.
His average cell count is 120, and in 2010 he had no cases of mastitis. If you want to see his National Milk Records (NMR) annual summary showing zero mastitis, and learn how the back-flush machine was built and fitted into the parlour, you’ll need to see Practical Farm Ideas Vol 18, issue 4. You can access the report at http://www.farmideas.co.uk/articles/home-made-cluster-back-flush-controls-mastitis/14367 for just 99p. Or buy Vol 18 issue 4 from the www.farmideas.co.uk website.
The machine uses a standard workshop air compressor that propels a slug of dilute 5% paracetic acid back through the clusters. He back-flushes with a single lever which he activates for just five seconds. The rinsing solution is made up using a Dosatron proportional dispenser, used widely in industry and medicine.
Using the compressor means there is no added strain on the vacuum pump, and the manual control means the milker is in charge.
The question is — how many farmers at the London meeting had mastitis control as good as this?
Home