16-19C
Generally fine

Find a...

Date Job Car Home











I’m still sceptical of ESM reassurances

The fiscal treaty referendum is concluded, the Irish people have spoken, and the country moves on.

In the final week of the campaign, I was among an invited audience at a debate chaired by Matt Cooper between the ‘yes’ and the ‘no’ sides and broadcast from UCC by Today FM’s Last Word programme.

I scored it a draw, with the speakers doing justice to their respective positions.

The ‘no’ side started strongly and put the ‘yes’ side, led by Agriculture Minister Simon Coveney, on the back foot.

Gradually, the minister and his team fought back, and contained the arguments of their opponents.

My question was ‘if the setting-up of the ESM fund did not go well, would the EU/CAP budget come under pressure’?

I watched and listened with interest as the minister answered, not responding to my ‘what if there isn’t enough money?’ fears, but concentrating on the point that the CAP budget is an independent entity.

Despite Minister Coveney’s reassurances, I remain sceptical on how Europe will find the money to fund the ESM.

Because of the nature of the referendum, a complex international treaty on the viability and survivability of the euro, and because events internationally may yet influence its final outcome, none of the combatants in Cork appeared able to land a truly crippling blow on the opposition.

That said, Caroline Simons, on the ‘no’ side, appeared well-briefed and offered balance in the face of the ministerial-led opposition.

On the ‘yes’ side, the minister led from the front and debated ably, and by heading up the Government’s ‘yes’ campaign, Coveney has probably come out of the campaign with his reputation as a politician, and confidence as a negotiator, enhanced.

This is all good from a farming perspective, with the CAP negotiations only months away.

However, as the financial crisis continues, I will be watching carefully this autumn for budget or administration issues that may result in delays in the run-up to payment of the 2012 single farm payment.

nMeanwhile, back home in Co Waterford, I noted over the weekend that sections of local roadside verges appear to be turning brown, as if they have been sprayed.

I can only assume this has been done by our local council, because the areas affected seem to be exclusively around road signage, crash barriers, corners, junctions and rain water run-off cuts.

Apart from the effect on the image of Ireland as “a green and pleasant land”, this apparent extensive use of chemicals, as opposed to the traditional approach to roadside maintenance, raises other, more serious issues.

As custodians of the countryside, farmers are aware that there are strict regulations governing the use of chemicals for the control of weeds.

These regulations govern their use close to water-courses, the effects on wildlife, and the danger of run-off into the wider environment.

Do the same considerations apply to the control of herbage on the roadside?

If this operation was sanctioned by the council, questions need to be asked. On a more technical point, they appear ignorant that there are herbicides on the market that kill selectively and don’t leave the area sprayed totally denuded of life and open to re-colonisation by weeds and briars.

One herbicide, in particular, kills only weeds and briars, and has no effect on grass. I’ve used it occasionally under electric fences to eliminate weeds and have seen the areas spayed rapidly green-up as grass re-establishes.

However, I wouldn’t use it to tidy up the ditches on my driveway.

© Irish Examiner Ltd. All rights reserved

Home

More from the Irish Examiner