16-19C
Generally fine

Find a...

Date Job Car Home















A no vote could cripple us in European talks

The latest global economic prognosis from the OECD does not make for reassuring reading.

It paints a picture of a global economic outlook, or at least the developed part of the world, that will be quite depressed over the next couple of years.

It is predicting recovery, but the recovery is expected to be quite muted, particularly in the eurozone. Based on the current unsustainable level of government debt and the still very fragile nature of the global banking system and the consequent scarcity of credit, recovery was always going to be a slow and difficult affair.

For the small, open Irish economy the external economic prognosis is not exactly what is required, and already we are starting to see signs that the deterioration in the global environment over recent months is starting to impact negatively on the export performance.

In theory, the election of the new French president is positive news for the Irish economy. François Hollande fought the election on the basis of the need for an economic stimulus in Europe. Given the eurozone’s recent and prospective dismal economic performance, such a stimulus cannot come too soon, but it is not clear what such policies might need to contain to be effective.

One clear impediment to growth is the anti-inflation and by definition anti-growth bias built into the ECB mandate. The paranoia of the ECB was in evidence last year when at the first signs of growth in the eurozone, the trigger happy institution couldn’t help itself and moved to tighten interest rates twice by a combined 0.5%. These moves were premature and were partly instrumental in engineering the subsequent sharp slowdown in eurozone economic activity.

The magnitude of the rate increase is not the issue, but it is the psychological message that this paranoid behaviour displayed. The ECB has got to make a contribution to recovery.

The problem, of course, is that if 1% base rates do not encourage economic activity, what impact would a cut of 0.5% or 0.75% have? This is a good question, but it would send out a clear message about a change of focus in the ECB. In the longer term, an examination of the ECB’s mandate should be undertaken to determine if a more balanced mandate, encouraging growth, would be more appropriate.

Of course, much more is needed to lift the moribund euro economy out of its malaise. Reform of labour markets; the purchasing of bonds by the ECB; infrastructure funding from the European Investment Bank; tax incentives; the quantitative easing of money supply; and some sort of debt relief for the most heavily and hopelessly indebted peripheral countries, including Ireland, are just some of the short and long-term growth initiatives required.

From an Irish perspective, anything that would boost eurozone growth would be good for the country. However, there are three key impending interactions with Europe that will be crucial to Ireland’s future.

There is the imminent reform of the CAP; the restructuring of government debt, particularly in relation related to the infamous promissory notes; and financial assistance from Europe to address the personal debt mess. These are three of the biggest battles we have to fight with Europe.

All three are crucial to Ireland’s longer-term future and those who are calling for a no vote in the referendum should remember that. If we reject the fiscal treaty, we will seriously undermine our negotiating strength in relation to all three issues.

The no side would obviously get a major boost from a rejection and might feel that Ireland has taken a step to restore some pride, but the campaigners should be mindful of the longer-term damage they could do. There are much bigger battles to fight with Europe than this treaty, and we should keep our powder dry for those.

© Irish Examiner Ltd. All rights reserved

Home

More from the Irish Examiner