Explainer: What is the AstraZeneca vaccine supply row about?
A row has erupted between the European Union, the United Kingdom and pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca over the supply of coronavirus vaccines.
The EU is frustrated at supply shortages and has demanded AstraZeneca doses be sent from British plants to make up for a shortfall.
Hereâs what we know about the dispute and its potential implications:
AstraZeneca has said initial deliveries to the EU will fall short because of a production glitch â said to be at a hub in Belgium â and it will not be able to meet its supply targets for the first three months of this year.
The Anglo-Swedish company announced initial deliveries in the EU would total approximately 31 million doses, rather than the anticipated 80 million in the first quarter of the year.
With the speed of the UKâs vaccine rollout outstripping other European countries, the EU has suggested doses produced in Europe have been directed elsewhere.
EU Commission president Ursula von der Leyen has now called for an explanation from AstraZeneca for delivery hold-ups, as she insisted the supply orders are âbindingâ and âthe contract is crystal clearâ.
EU health commissioner Stella Kyriakides has accused AstraZeneca of a âlack of clarityâ and âinsufficient explanationsâ, adding âthe answers of the company have not been satisfactoryâ following a meeting on Monday.
She has proposed forcing all drug-makers to register their Covid-19 vaccine exports in advance, so the bloc can keep track of what they are doing.
Following talks on Wednesday, Ms Kyriakides added: âWe regret the continued lack of clarity on the delivery schedule.â
Latvian foreign affairs minister Edgars Rinkevics said states could take AstraZeneca to court for breach of supply contracts if it does not honour its delivery schedule.
And Germanyâs health minister Jens Spahn supported restrictions on vaccine exports, saying Europe should have its âfair shareâ.
He added: âI can understand that there are production problems but then it must affect everyone in the same way.â
The companyâs chief executive Pascal Soriot said the contract only committed to meet the EUâs demands to its âbest effortâ.
In an interview with Italyâs la Repubblica newspaper that was published on Tuesday, he said the EUâs deliveries were delayed in part because the bloc signed its contract three months later than the UK, and therefore EU manufacturing facilities were still catching up
Translated by Politico, Mr Soriot reportedly said the âcontract is very clear: Our commitment is, I am quoting, âour best effort'â.
He explained that AstraZeneca and its partner Oxford University had signed a deal with the UK Government for 100 million doses three months before the EU deal for 400 million doses was agreed.
In response to the EU demanding their doses were shipped concurrently, Mr Soriot suggested it was a âsuper stretch goalâ, and added: âWe said, âOkay, weâre going to do our best, weâre going to try, but we cannot commit contractually because we are three months behind UKâ.â
British Prime Minister Boris Johnson said this week he is âvery confidentâ about the UKâs vaccine supply, while UK Cabinet Office minister Michael Gove insisted there âwill be no interruptionâ.
Government vaccine tsar Nadhim Zahawi also said on Tuesday he is âconfidentâ supply of the Pfizer jab â which is produced in Belgium â will continue.
Asked if the EU could prevent Pfizer vaccines from being exported, he told Sky News: âNo, Iâm confident that the Pfizer vaccine will be delivered.
âPfizer have made sure that they have always delivered for us.
âThey will continue to do so.â
The vaccine is expected to be approved today by the EMA.
The HSE's Chief Clinical Officer, Dr Colm Henry, said they are waiting for that EU advice before making decisions on use.
There are fears that Ireland's supply of the vaccine could be halved.Â
Dr Henry acknowledged today the concern expressed in Germany that relatively few older people had been included in the AstraZeneca trials which made it hard to draw confident conclusions, âbut that doesn't mean that the vaccine isn't effective among older people and the EMA will consider the limited information available, but also how they can extrapolate from the results among younger people to older people - I would urge people, let's wait and see.
âWe know what the absence of a vaccine means - we've seen that for the last 11 months and it doesn't look good.
"The vaccine is the one beacon of hope we have in 2021 for older and younger people.â