Jose Mourinho is expected to give evidence at an employment tribunal brought by former Chelsea first-team doctor Eva Carneiro after she reportedly turned down an offer of £1.2m to settle.
Dr Carneiro alleges she was sexually discriminated against by the club’s former manager, who allegedly abused her as she went on to the pitch to treat Eden Hazard during the opening day of the Premier League season last August.
She claims that, as she ran on to the pitch during the game with Swansea, Mourinho shouted “filha da puta”, meaning ‘daughter of a whore’ in Portuguese, at her.
The panel at the London South Employment Tribunal in Croydon was read an extract from Mourinho’s statement in which he conceded that he used the term “filho da puta”, meaning “son of of a whore”, but insisted he had been using it throughout the match.
He said: “Filho da puta is a phrase I often use, all of the players know it. There is no sexist connotation in the use of the phrase — it is just like saying ‘fuck off’.
“In the world of football, a lot of swear words are used.”
He added that Cesc Fabregas had used the Spanish equivalent of the term when a Chelsea player was fouled during the game.
In his statement, Mourinho said: “Cesc and I both speak English well, but in the heat of the game we swear in our mother tongue.
“Eva was not on the pitch at that point in time.”
Mary O’Rourke QC, representing Dr Carneiro, said: “He uses the word ‘filha’ because he is abusing a woman.”
In an opening argument, she argues the expression is “very offensive” and that it was aimed at her client because she was the “only female pitchside”.
Preliminary matters in the case were dealt with on Monday morning, after the parties failed to agree a settlement which would have prevented a public hearing.
A skeleton argument submitted to the tribunal, on behalf of Chelsea FC and Mourinho, stated that Dr Carneiro had been “made an open offer of £1.2m to settle her claims”.
It continued: “The respondents have taken these steps only because they believe that it is in no one’s interests that this dispute should be determined through litigation. They are conscious that, whatever the facts, it is likely to be widely and incorrectly assumed that they could have avoided this coming tribunal.”
Dr Carneiro is claiming constructive dismissal against Chelsea and has a separate, but connected, personal legal action against Mourinho, who left the club in December, for alleged victimisation and discrimination.
© Irish Examiner Ltd. All rights reserved