If you would like to submit a contribution to our Readers Blog section then follow this link. Be sure to include your full name, address and contact number otherwise your submission will not be considered for publication. We will contact you prior to publication.

Same sex ‘marriage’ would just be a sentimental lie to promote inclusion

Men just married

Nowadays, there are new notions about marriage: ie allowing people of the same sex to form a union and marry. 

These ideas are created out of of compassion, not common sense. So, it is necessary to reiterate a fact. Biologically, two people of the same sex cannot reproductively mate, and therefore should not be allowed marry.

The marriage cannot be consummated because procreation cannot occur. The ‘notions’ undermine the principle reason for mating: to produce children and ensure the future of the species; and they negate hereditary principles. Terminology is being shoehorned to declare a falsehood. The term ‘same-sex marriage’ is a misnomer and is idiotic in construction.

For a marriage to result in a family unit, sperm and egg must be present. The chromosomal and genetic material is provided by the couple. There is no other construct. ‘Notions’ to the contrary are figments of idiotic and delusional thinking. Same-sex couples do not have the requisite genitalia to mate. All that can be gained is a document bequeathing the title ‘marriage’. Such a document diminishes the statue of the basic concept. The principle is reduced to a travesty.

Moreover, because the idea of equality is established by inference, the reproductive dignity of those who can and do procreate is reduced: ie same sex marriage is falsely claiming an elevated position.

The elevation of same sex couples to ‘marriage’ reduces the gravitas of the title for the many who can beget. Moreover, the first principle of reproduction is devalued.

Also, non-procreative unions eliminate the relationship principle ie mother, father, grandmother, grandfather, etc. These titles cease to exist, unless artificially contrived.

A document proclaiming ‘marriage’ can be written to cover any same sex couple. If granted, recipients of such ‘marriage’ certificates will find that they have gained little.

If the idea helps to alleviate some notions of exclusion, there may be some sentimental merit in the concept, but no gain.

To conclude: yes to same sex unions, and no to same sex marriages.

Bernard J. Egan BSc


Co Donegal

More on this topic

Colourful celebrations in Taipei as Taiwan legalises same-sex marriageColourful celebrations in Taipei as Taiwan legalises same-sex marriage

Netflix documentary shows Ireland's fight for marriage equalityNetflix documentary shows Ireland's fight for marriage equality

Justin McAleese: Faith-based objections have no place in secular marriageJustin McAleese: Faith-based objections have no place in secular marriage

Bermuda becomes first country to repeal law allowing same-sex marraigeBermuda becomes first country to repeal law allowing same-sex marraige


Dr Sarah Miller is the CEO of Dublin’s Rediscovery Centre, the national centre for the Circular Economy in Ireland. She has a degree in Biotechnology and a PHD in Environmental Science in Waste Conversion Technologies.‘We have to give people positive messages’

When I was pregnant with Joan, I knew she was a girl. We didn’t find out the gender of the baby, but I just knew. Or else, I so badly wanted a girl, I convinced myself that is exactly what we were having.Mum's the Word: I have a confession: I never wanted sons. I wanted daughters

What is it about the teenage years that are so problematic for families? Why does the teenage soul rage against the machine of the adult world?Learning Points: It’s not about the phone, it’s about you and your teen

Judy Collins is 80, and still touring. As she gets ready to return to Ireland, she tells Ellie O’Byrne about the songs that have mattered most in her incredible 60-year career.The songs that matter most to Judy Collins from her 60-year career

More From The Irish Examiner