Tuberculosis is still killing millions of people, particularly in the developing world, but the urgent action needed to stop it does not seem to be in place, writes Tomaso Clavarino
THE dirt roads are dusty in the summer and a quagmire when it starts to rain. The gutters, few and far between, fill up quickly with milky, putrid water.
Khayelitsha, the second-largest South African township, is a stretch of wooden and tin shacks clumped tightly together. It’s growing quickly.
Although there are no official estimates, it is believed that since 2001, the population has risen by 200,000, pushing the total to more than 500,000. New houses are eating the last free areas of land. Tin huts have been thrown up on the beach, all the way to the dunes that mark the township’s boundary with neighbouring Cape Town.
A silent killer stalks the land. TB’s low profile probably due to the fact that while it was once a leading cause of death in Western Europe and North America, it has largely been eradicated in these regions.
The World Health Organisation estimates that in South Africa, TB infects 450,000 people every year. In the minibuses that function as public transport for the majority of people, in churches, in bars, in houses — in any small, poorly ventilated space — all it takes is one cough.
And once infected, many will die. The WHO estimates there were 96,000 TB-related deaths in South Africa in 2014, making the illness the leading cause of death in the country.
Phumeza Tisile, of Khayelitsha, was diagnosed with TB in 2010. At first, she was given the usual first-line drugs for the infectious disease. But after a few months of treatment, her doctors discovered that her body wasn’t responding to the treatment — she had multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.
MDR-TB, as it’s often called, is the result of an infection by a form of M tuberculosis that has mutated to survive the drugs typically used to treat regular TB — isoniazid, rifampin, ethambutol, pyrazinamide. The problem is escalating.
The WHO estimates that in South Africa, for example, cases of MDR-TB rose from 2,000 in 2005 to about 8,000 in 2014. Essentially, drug resistance arises in areas with weak TB control programmes.
If a patient is not treated long enough or doesn’t take prescribed medications properly, the weaker bacteria die off but the stronger survive.
These bacteria then replicate and eventually spread.
Perversely, our improved ability to recognise MDR-TB is helping make the disease stronger. The treatment for drug-resistant TB is long and painful, and many patients end up quitting midway through — which again encourages TB bacteria to grow stronger.
Unlike regular TB, which takes six to nine months to treat, MDR-TB requires treatment for up to two years, involving something like 14,600 pills and hundreds of injections.
It’s very expensive and painful, and it comes with a high risk of serious side effects. “During the treatment period, I felt really bad. I vomited and felt sick all the time. I couldn’t eat, and I slowly lost my hearing until I became completely deaf,” says Tisile.
And even then, the treatment didn’t seem to work. After further analyses, her doctors gave her the bad news: She had extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB), which is as bad as it sounds.
This form of TB can’t be cured even with second-line drugs. To defeat XDR-TB, you need treatments that can cost €24,000, 100 times more than the cost of a course of treatment for common TB.
Eventually, with the financial assistance of Médecins Sans Frontières, Tisile finally got the right treatment, and in August 2013, her TB tests came up negative. Still, she could no longer hear or talk.
This year, she had two cochlear implants, which restored her hearing. Despite her suffering, Tisile was relatively lucky. The treatments for the XDR-TB are successful just 20% of the time, according to the latest WHO TB report.
At the Brooklyn Chest Hospital, a few miles from the centre of Cape Town, men and women, young and old, walk the corridors with masks covering their faces — the identifying mark for those who have caught TB.
The simple paper masks are indispensable to prevent contagion but unbearable because of the discomfort they cause and the attention they attract.
“Many people prefer to risk contagion rather than using masks,” says Dr Paul Spiller, who heads up Brooklyn Chest. “This [is] because of the stigma against TB patients that in South Africa is still very strong.”
People with TB here fear meeting their neighbours on the way to the hospital, fear having to say to their relatives that they are TB-positive, and fear being abandoned by family and community.
“When two years ago I discovered I was TB-positive, and a little later also HIV-positive too, my family disappeared,” says Moses Michize, 42.
“I have not heard from them since — not a phonecall or a visit for the entire treatment period. I no longer exist to them.”
To avoid social isolation, people with TB hide their disease and don’t get proper treatment. That means they often don’t learn the very basics of the illness, says Sive Mapeitu, a 27-year-old health care worker.
“People know little or nothing about the new forms of tuberculosis, do not know how to prevent it, do not understand why the masks are necessary,” she says.
“The majority of people, if they start to cough, they just cure themselves as if they had caught a cold, and if the cough goes on, they pretend they’re fine. Very few of them decide of their own free will to go and take the test.”
Mapeitu is MDR-TB-positive. “I am sure I was infected while working in Guguletu, a township in Cape Town where I used to live and where I spent all day with infected people — a filthy environment, 20 people using the same bathroom, no sewers, so of course TB proliferates.”
Anyone can get TB. Ivan Ross, a 61-year-old fisherman who lives in a wooden shack fell ill in the hold of a boat, where the air is stagnant, the humidity high and cold gets into your bones.
Because of the illness, Ross had to stop working; today, he makes a few euro here and there by charging kids in the township of Hout Bay to play some old ’90s console-based video games he owns.
On the opposite end of the spectrum is Dalene von Delft, a 33-year-old doctor who lives in the wealthy neighbourhood of Somerset West. She, like Mapeitu, was infected on the job.
But there’s also one particular community in South Africa that suffers more than others from the disease: The miners.
They are the economic backbone of South Africa. With its platinum, coal, manganese, chromium, and gold, the mining industry represents one the country’s most important resources, making up 8% of its GDP.
For centuries, TB has affected the miners here at higher than normal rates. Today, despite the commitments made by mining companies to guarantee the health and safety of workers, TB continues to claim victims.
“The basic problem is that mines are, I dare to say, an environment worse than hell itself,” says Georgina Jephson, a lawyer in Johannesburg.
“Temperatures reach [95 to 100 fahrenheit, about 35C]. The air is stagnant. There is no ventilation whatsoever, and dust gets into the lungs. And when miners breathe silica dust, coming from the explosions, they are exposed to great risks to their health.”
The miners typically spend 12 to 14 hours a day in this asphyxiating heat.
Jephson, together with the Richard Spoor Law Office, is currently representing thousands of miners in a trial involving 30 of the major mining companies of South Africa.
They are seeking justice — and compensation — for the health problems they’ve developed on the job.
“According to recent studies, one miner in four has got silicosis, and this is the first step toward tuberculosis,” says Jephson.
Silicosis is an illness caused by the inhalation of silica dust, which is present in huge quantities in the mines. As time passes, this dust weakens the lung’s defence system, making it more susceptible to an M. tuberculosis infection.
RESEARCHERS, doctors, professors and health care workers all agree that tuberculosis does not get the attention or investment from international donors that such a deadly killer — the most lethal single infectious agent in the world — deserves.
In large part, this is because pharmaceutical companies are abandoning investment in TB research. Pfizer stopped funding TB research in 2012, AstraZeneca in 2013, Novartis in 2014. Overall, private sector investment in TB research has diminished by a third from 2011 to today.
“The explanation is quite simple: The research on TB does not make enough profit,” says Nesri Padayatchi, deputy director of the Center for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa.
“Moreover, in Western countries, it is looked upon as a disease of the Third World, of poor people.”
In September, the United Nations adopted a new set of sustainable development goals, intergovernmental targets for broadly improving the world. One key target: End the epidemic of tuberculosis by 2030.
Mario Raviglione, director of the WHO’s tuberculosis programme, says that the goal is feasible, but very ambitious, in part because TB is actually not an epidemic like Ebola — one that comes on quickly and strongly but then fades into memory. “TB is an endemic disease” he said. “It has found its balance amongst the people.”
The dreaded disease, now insidious, has become severely difficult to root out. But not impossible — if investment into TB research begins to grow again.
And if you visit the broken township of Khayelitsha, or the ghostly halls of the Brooklyn Chest Hospital or the hot, dusty Gauteng mines, and you’ll see why it’ll be worth it.
This investigative report was conducted with the support of the "Innovation in Development Reporting Grant" program of the European Journalism Centre (EJC), financed by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
© Irish Examiner Ltd. All rights reserved