IAAF look at plans to rewrite record books

Athletics’ world governing body the IAAF has been urged to accept a “radical” new proposal that would lead to the sport’s world records being rewritten.

European Athletics announced yesterday that its ruling Council had accepted a project team’s recommendations to overhaul the record lists by eliminating any doping doubts surrounding performances.

European Athletics said it would now forward them to the IAAF “with the recommendation that the two organisations coordinate the implementation of new record ratification rules”.

The new proposal “calls for higher technical standards, increased doping control measures and new personal integrity requirements for record holders”, the European governing body said.

The idea is to make record-breaking performances as credible as possible, at a time of ultra-scepticism.

European Athletics president Svein Arne Hansen said: “Performance records that show the limits of human capabilities are one of the great strengths of our sport, but they are meaningless if people don’t really believe them.

“What we are proposing is revolutionary, not just because most world and European records will have to be replaced, but because we want to change the concept of a record and raise the standards for recognition to a point where everyone can be confident that everything is fair and above board.”

Under the new standards, a world record would only be recognised if it met three key criteria: It was achieved at a competition on a list of approved international events where the highest standards of officiating and technical equipment can be guaranteed; the athlete had been subject to an agreed number of doping control tests in the months leading up to it; and the doping control sample taken after the record was stored and available for re-testing for 10 years.

The project team also recommended that a performance be wiped from the record books if the athlete involved “commits a doping or integrity violation, even if it does not directly impact the record performance”.

Current records not meeting the criteria would remain on the all-time list but no longer be officially recognised as records.

Hansen added: “It’s a radical solution for sure, but those of us who love athletics are tired of the cloud of doubt and innuendo that has hung over our records for too long. We need decisive action to restore credibility and trust.”

Hansen said he would encourage the IAAF to adopt the proposal at its Council meeting in August and in the mean time would be checking the recommendations were legally robust.

IAAF president Lord Coe, who attended the final session of the European Athletics Council meeting on Sunday, said: “I like this because it underlines that we (the governing bodies) have put into place doping control systems and technology that are more robust and safer than 15 or even 10 years ago.

“Of course, for this to be adopted for world records by the IAAF it needs global approval from all area associations.

“There will be athletes, current record holders, who will feel that the history we are recalibrating will take something away from them, but I think this is a step in the right direction and if organised and structured properly we have a good chance of winning back credibility in this area.”


As UK legend John Surman gets ready to play at Cork’s jazz fest, he tells Philip Watson about his well-travelled career and why he’s so angry about Brexit.Jazz legend John Surman on a well travelled career and why he's angry about Brexit

Dr Naomi Lavelle answers a weekly science question.Fish live in water all their lives but does that mean that they never get thirsty or do they even drink at all? To answer these questions we need to look at where the fish live.Appliance of Science: Do fish ever get thirsty?

More From The Irish Examiner