RTÉ to seek court permission to report Dáil claims

State broadcaster RTÉ will seek High Court permission on Tuesday to report Independent TD Catherine Murphy’s full Dáil comments about businessman Denis O’Brien’s dealings with IBRC.

The fresh salvo in the legal row was confirmed by RTÉ last night in a bid to “report on the matter as comprehensively as possible, as early as possible”.

Ms Murphy made her comments in the Dáil on Thursday. Despite the remarks being made under Dáil privilege, which, under article 15.12 of the Constitution means they can be reported without the threat of legal action, Mr O’Brien’s lawyers believe the information is covered by an existing temporary injunction.

This injunction against RTÉ business editor David Murphy was made on May 21 and is due to be finalised next Friday, June 5, at 10.30am.

The reason for the two-week delay is because it has still to be decided what aspects of the judgment — including details of the case — will be redacted, and as the High Court is currently on a fortnight’s leave, Friday is the next date it sits.

However, in light of Ms Murphy’s comments on Thursday, RTÉ confirmed last night that it will seek permission to report full details of what she said three days earlier, on Tuesday, as this is technically a different case due to Dáil privilege and that some information may not be subjudice.

A spokesperson for RTÉ said:

“Every effort will continue to be made to report as comprehensively as possible, as early as possible, within the limits of the law.”

It is understood that RTÉ is also taking legal advice on whether to appeal the original injunction.

Separately, Mr O’Brien’s lawyers have told the website broadsheet.ie it facesan injunction for publishing Ms Murphy’s Dáil comments.

The video and transcript are also on oireachtas.ie, but Leinster House officials have “no plans” to take them down.

Meanwhile, a constitutional lawyer has suggested Mr O’Brien may need to go to the European Court of Human Rights to prevent TDs and senators from discussing the matter under privilege.

Barrister and UCD lecturer Paul Anthony McDermott said this is because the courts are unlikely to rule against parliamentary privilege, meaning he may have to put in the application to protect his privacy as there “does not appear to be a remedy under Irish law”.

He said the row is “unprecedented” and will have wide-reaching consequences.

READ NEXT: No Dáil recall to discuss ban on speech


More on this topic

O'Brien wins defamation caseO'Brien wins defamation case

O'Brien 'entitled to same justice as any citizen', defamation trial toldO'Brien 'entitled to same justice as any citizen', defamation trial told


Esther N McCarthy paints a pretty picture with her January picks, along with cool ideas for fridges and lunchboxesWishlist: Fridges and lunchboxes make our list of January picks

Maturity isn’t a good fit for every rapper (see: Kanye’s bedraggled coming-to-Jesus phase). But through 2018 it was working a treat for former bad boy — and Ariana Grande’s ex — Mac Miller. But then his story turned to tragedy as that September, the 26 year-old died of an accidental drug overdose.Review: Mac Miller - Circles

The year is 2399, and Jean-Luc Picard dreams of his old ship, destroyed three decades ago, and his dear friend, the android Data, dead 20 years now. Dreams turn to nightmare, and Picard awakens, old and defeated, in his French château.Review: Star Trek: Picard

A Polish prisoner carefully checks there are no guards around before he enters one of the SS cloakrooms in Auschwitz. He takes out a hidden vial and quickly sprinkles its contents on the collars of those hated uniforms, before slipping out again. Within two weeks some of the Germans had come down with the typhoid that was wiping out so many of the prisoners.Gripping account of the hero who volunteered to go to Auschwitz

More From The Irish Examiner