Couple can stay in house for birth, High Court rules

A heavily pregnant woman and her partner, who are living in a property acquired by a fund, can remain there until at least October, a High Court judge has said.

Mr Justice Paul Gilligan noted Melanie Mook and Colm O’Nuanain are expecting their first baby in August and want a home birth and said he hoped that would work out as they desired.

The judge said there were negotiations between the couple and the fund about their buying the property at 85-86 Barrack St, Cork, they are making “serious efforts” to stay there but had also indicated they would leave if serious difficulties arose.

He said he hoped the legal dispute could be resolved by October.

The fund — Targeted Investment Opportunities ICAV — has taken proceedings in relation to the property where the couple have lived for some years. They ran a coffee shop there at one stage and occasionally rent out part of the premises via Airbnb.

In proceedings initiated last month, the fund seeks various orders, including for vacant possession of the premises.

Representing themselves, the couple say they have nowhere else to go and have been in negotiations for some time with a view to buying the property. Up to now, they were permitted to live there without paying rent, the court heard.

When the case returned to court yesterday, Nevan Powell BL, for the fund, said the only issue he was pursuing for the moment was to inspect the property.

Mr Powell said the fund — which bought the property in late 2014 from a receiver appointed by Bank of Ireland Mortgage Bank — has never seen the property. Having been provided by the couple with an engineer’s report concerning the property, it wanted to inspect it for reasons including concerns about potential legal liability attaching to the fund.

The report raised concerns about structural and fire safety issues which it would cost up to €300,000 to address, counsel said.

The judge sought the report and, having read it, said it addressed issues common to buildings as old as this property, including about the size of windows, and it did not appear any issue required to be urgently addressed.

Mr O Nuanain said he and his partner were never asked by the fund or its agents about inspection of the property and were not objecting to inspection. Their engineers’ report, which raised an issue about getting fire cladding for the cafe part of the premises, was provided to the fund last January and they heard nothing about it until the court case, he said.

Having heard the sides, the judge said the inspection could take place next Monday and the case could go back to October by which time he hoped matters would be resolved.

The fund claims it bought the property in December 2014 and was registered in March 2015 as full owner. It claims neither it nor the previous owners granted the couple a valid tenancy and they have no legal entitlement to be there.

The couple say that, with the agreement of a previous tenant, they entered the property some years ago and remained without being required to pay rent. They say they have resided in, and operated a business from, the premises for years and had been in talks with agents for the owners for a long-term lease with a first refusal on sale at market rate.



Breaking Stories

Gardaí seize €70k of drugs and cash in Dublin raid

Pope's visit an opportunity for all to reflect on key questions facing Irish society: Bishop

'He was my dad and I love him very much,' son accused of murdering father told Gardaí

Judge grants bail for second 13-year-old boy charged with Ana Kriegel murder

More From The Irish Examiner