US settles with 9/11 detainee for $300,000

The US government has agreed to pay $300,000 (€252,000) to an Egyptian man who was detained for nearly a year following the September 11, 2001, attacks but was never linked to terrorism.

The settlement was filed in Brooklyn federal court yesterday, said lawyer Haeyoung Yoon, who represents Ehab Elmaghraby. She said she believed it was the first settlement involving the claims of people detained after September 11.

Elmaghraby, a former restaurant worker, was held at the Metropolitan Detention Centre in Brooklyn from October 1, 2001, until August 2002, Yoon said.

He was not charged with any crime connected to terrorism, but pleaded guilty to credit card fraud and was deported in August 2003. He now says he’s innocent of the credit card fraud, Yoon said.

In a lawsuit filed in August 2004, Elmaghraby and a Pakistani man, Javaid Iqbal, claimed their rights were violated in US custody and sought compensatory damages. They also argued that the government wouldn’t let them appeal against their solitary confinement in a special unit of the detention centre.

Their lawsuit named former US Attorney General John Ashcroft and dozens of other federal officials.

Elmaghraby said he was shackled, shoved into walls, punched and called a terrorist and epithets at the facility. Yoon said he was subjected to repetitive strip searches.

While in custody, Elmaghraby’s thyroid condition was misdiagnosed as asthma, worsening it, Yoon said. He wanted to continue with the lawsuit but settled because of his mounting medical costs, she said.

“Despite the fact that the US admitted no wrongdoing,” Yoon said, “they are compensating Mr. Elmaghraby for the injuries he suffered.”

The Metropolitan Detention Centre was cited for brutal treatment of detainees in a 2003 report by the Department of Justice’s inspector general.

The settlement, first reported by The New York Times on its website late yesterday, must be approved by a federal judge. Iqbal’s case against the government continues.

A federal judge in September 2005 rejected a claim by Ashcroft that the lawsuit should be dismissed partly because the threat of foreign terrorism exempts the government from following rules made in peacetime.

Ashcroft said in a response to the lawsuit that the threat of terrorist attacks meant the government should not have been required to follow regulations allowing inmates to appeal assignment to the special unit.

More than 80 men were classified as suspected terrorists and were jailed in high-security cells at the Brooklyn facility between September 14, 2001, and August 27, 2002.

A separate class action lawsuit was filed in federal court in Brooklyn in 2002 on behalf of hundreds of detainees in Brooklyn and New Jersey.

In that lawsuit, the Centre for Constitutional Rights charged that Ashcroft and other officials subjected prisoners to excessively harsh conditions though they had not been charged with crimes.

More in this Section

Pensioner has no regrets over failed suicide pactPensioner has no regrets over failed suicide pact

UN report set to issue stark warning on climate change impact on oceansUN report set to issue stark warning on climate change impact on oceans

Iran vows to lead Gulf security as US sends more troops to regionIran vows to lead Gulf security as US sends more troops to region

Holidaymakers held in Tunisia hotel over Thomas Cook crisisHolidaymakers held in Tunisia hotel over Thomas Cook crisis


Lifestyle

Mulranny, in the shadow of the Nephin Beg Mountains on the north shore of Clew Bay, is a hill-walker’s paradise.Old Irish goats deserve to be nurtured

In awe of nature’s bounty on a glorious September dayIn awe of nature’s bounty on a glorious September day

Rotten by name but certainly not by nature.Islands of Ireland: Rotten to the core

There’s a revealing story well told by the writer Alice Taylor about the day a neighbour gave a present of a poached salmon to her family.Alice’s salmon of knowledge

More From The Irish Examiner