Donald Trump's travel ban: What happens now?

Donald Trump has told reporters on Air Force One that he’s considering signing a “brand new order” after a federal appeals court refused to reinstate his ban on travellers from seven predominantly Muslim nations.

He has also promised more legal action (remember the “SEE YOU IN COURT” tweet? Of course you do), but exactly what he has in mind remains to be seen.

For now, refugees and people from the seven nations the order was aimed at – Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen – can continue entering the United States. Here’s a look at where the legal fight goes from here.

What exactly did Trump say to Air Force One reporters?

The US president told them he expected his administration to win the legal battle over his original directive.

But he also said the White House was considering other alternatives – according to Trump, this includes making unspecified changes to the order, which could address some of the legal issues.

So, what could happen next at the appeals court?

The Trump administration could decide to ask the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals to reconsider the three-judge panel’s ruling. But Margo Schlanger, a law professor at the University of Michigan, said the odds of success seem low.

She noted that the three-judge panel was unanimous and included a judge chosen by a Republican president.

Right. And what about the Supreme Court – how likely is it that the government will file an emergency appeal to restore the ban?

Well, it would take at least five justices to overturn the ruling from the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals – so that may be a long shot.

The high court still has only eight members since the death of Justice Antonin Scalia – four conservative and four liberal justices.

“There are almost surely four votes to deny an emergency request to reinstate the order,” said Peter Spiro, a law professor at Temple University.

The last immigration case to reach the justices ended in a 4-4 deadlock last year, suggesting a similar split over Trump’s order – this would let the 9th Circuit ruling stand and keep the freeze in place.

So, what else could happen next?

Well, if the Supreme Court declines to intervene right away, the case would remain in the 9th Circuit and ultimately be considered on its legal merits.

It also could return to US District Judge James Robart in Seattle, who temporarily blocked the ban after Washington state and Minnesota urged a nationwide hold on the January 27 order.

The lower court action so far is temporary – it simply halts deportations or other actions until judges can more fully consider whether the order violates legal or constitutional rights.

By the time a ruling on the merits comes down, the Senate may have confirmed Judge Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court. That may improve Trump’s chances to prevail on appeal.

But just how the issue might reach the Supreme Court is not clear. Several other challenges have been launched in courts around the country, and the court could opt to wait before stepping in.

And how could Trump revise the executive order?

The White House could amend the executive order to expressly carve out existing green card holders and other people that already have some ties to the United States.

Up to 60,000 visas were initially cancelled in the wake of the ban – affecting the lives of students, professors and workers.

White House counsel Donald McGahn had issued guidance days after the executive order saying it didn’t apply to legal permanent residents of the US, but the appeals court said that was not enough.

“The government has offered no authority establishing that the White House counsel is empowered to issue an amended order superseding the executive order signed by the president,” the opinion said.

Revising the order “shifts the legal boundaries so that it becomes a tougher constitutional target”, Spiro said.

What’s being said about the court’s decision to halt the ban?

“We’ll be doing things to continue to make our country safe,” Trump pledged at a news conference with Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe.

“It will happen rapidly. We will not allow people into our country who are looking to do harm to our people.”

Meanwhile, Senate minority Leader Chuck Schumer tweeted that Trump “ought to see the writing on the wall” and abandon the proposal. He also called on the president to “roll up his sleeves” and come up with “a real, bipartisan plan to keep us safe”.

House of Representatives Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi promised: “Democrats will continue to press for President Trump’s dangerous and unconstitutional ban to be withdrawn.”

The most talked-about reaction though was from his former presidential rival Hillary Clinton – she took to Twitter to post about the unanimous appeal court vote, simply writing: “3-0.”

Congress’ Republican leaders, House speaker Paul Ryan and Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell, declined to comment.

More on this topic

Here's what you need to know about Donald Trump’s latest travel banHere's what you need to know about Donald Trump’s latest travel ban

Donald Trump issues new US travel ban on eight countries including North KoreaDonald Trump issues new US travel ban on eight countries including North Korea

Americans urged to leave North Korea before travel ban beginsAmericans urged to leave North Korea before travel ban begins

Judge expands list of relatives exempted from US travel banJudge expands list of relatives exempted from US travel ban

More in this Section

Ornate ostrich eggs shed light on an interconnected ancient world – studyOrnate ostrich eggs shed light on an interconnected ancient world – study

Melania Trump spreads Easter cheer to workers during pandemicMelania Trump spreads Easter cheer to workers during pandemic

Ferrets ‘could help in development of coronavirus treatments and vaccines’Ferrets ‘could help in development of coronavirus treatments and vaccines’

Coronavirus lockdown exit strategies mulled by world governmentsCoronavirus lockdown exit strategies mulled by world governments


Lifestyle

Junior Cert and Leaving Cert students mustn’t be forced to go through the motions with state exams, and we need creative thinking to find alternatives fast, writes mother and educator Ellie O’Byrne.Policy fail? Insistence that state exams go ahead in June is glib and ignorant

Yes, we all need to stay at home but that doesn't mean your children have to be bored, says Michelle McGlynnWorld of wonder: What to do with the children outdoors

Over the next three weeks, I am going to outline how you can support yourself and your family over this period of lockdown, writes Richard Hogan.Learning Points: Keeping children on a healthy and happy regime

As we are settling into our new routines of self isolation, staying at home and home schooling it feels that a whole new set of pressures is coming down the tracks.Mum's The Word: Pressure to be productive in a world of online classes

More From The Irish Examiner