Letter to the Editor: Israelis are legal settlers of ‘Palestine territories’

Letter to the Editor: Israelis are legal settlers of ‘Palestine territories’

Israel’s occupation of the Palestinian territories (the West bank and the Gaza Strip) since 1967 is the subject of frequent debate in your newspaper, but much of that input is driven by emotion rather than detailed, factual knowledge. May I, therefore, be permitted to explain the status of the territory issue under international law.

Israel’s borders are defined in a number of international treaties, the most relevant of which are the League of Nations Treaty of July 24, 1922 (includes the San Remo Resolution April 25th, 1920), and the Treaty of Sevres, Section VI1, Article 95, which was inserted into the Mandate for Palestine and further ratified and endorsed by the Treaty of Lausanne, on July 24, 1923. The USA, not being a member nation of the League of Nations at the time, codified all this into US law in the Anglo American Convention of December 3, 1924.

The United Nations, in its Charter (specifically Article 80), was legally obligated to continue where the League of Nations finished and, indeed, the international, legally binding principles of estoppel and acquired rights further endorse these obligations. Acquired rights cannot take away from a nation what has been given and estoppel cannot allow any giving nation to take away what has been given, under international law.

According to the League of Nations resolution for the establishment of the Mandate for Palestine, the areas of Judea and Shomron — that is, the West Bank — were recognised as “cestui sue trust” for the Jewish homeland (that is, the state of Israel).

The defined legal borders of the state of Israel include the geographical areas currently called the West Bank (and Gaza, too). These territories were illegally conquered, and occupied, by Trans Jordan from 1948 to 1967 (during which time no offer to establish an independent state of Palestine was made to the residents). The territory had been unlawfully annexed and the former Jewish residents had been ethnically cleansed.

Article 42 of the fourth Hague Convention of October 18, 1907, respecting the laws and customs of war on land annexed, states that “..territory is considered occupied when it is actually placed under the authority of the hostile army and the occupation extends only to the territory where such authority has been established and can be exercised”.

The paradox is that the current Israeli settlers are the legal occupants and the Palestinians the illegal settlers, as a direct consequence of Trans Jordan’s occupation. Breaking the Geneva Convention does not apply to the government of Israel, but to Trans Jordan and also the other five Arab countries that, simultaneously, ethnically cleansed their Jewish civilians.

This will be somewhat unpalatable for some of your correspondents, who attempt to make a legal case for Palestinian claims to territory, as, under international law, no such claims exist. These are the legal facts.

Peter Baum
Southend Delegate on the Board of Deputies for British Jews,
Westcliff -on-Sea
Essex
England

More on this topic

Third Israeli election looms as Benjamin Netanyahu faces corruption chargesThird Israeli election looms as Benjamin Netanyahu faces corruption charges

Israel PM Benjamin Netanyahu cries ‘coup’ amid corruption chargesIsrael PM Benjamin Netanyahu cries ‘coup’ amid corruption charges

Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu charged with fraud and briberyIsraeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu charged with fraud and bribery

Israeli PM awaits decision on corruption chargesIsraeli PM awaits decision on corruption charges

More in this Section

Joe Leogue: Commitment to football grass roots is laudable but devil is in the detail Joe Leogue: Commitment to football grass roots is laudable but devil is in the detail

Fergus Finlay: Bad behaviour goes unpunished for some, so it will continue to happenFergus Finlay: Bad behaviour goes unpunished for some, so it will continue to happen

Michael Clifford: Is Boris Johnson the man for the moment?Michael Clifford: Is Boris Johnson the man for the moment?

Charlie Flanagan: Welcome new citizens to our Irish familyCharlie Flanagan: Welcome new citizens to our Irish family


Lifestyle

As David Attenborough announces new series on plants, we run down some of the weird and wonderful vegetation he might include.11 bizarre plant species from around the world

The weather’s always going to be a key factor on any wedding day — but especially so when the bride works for Met Éireann, writes Eve Kelliher.Wedding of the week: Bride and groom are literally on cloud nine

My wife and I are in our fifties and she has just started using porn. She thinks it will enhance our sex life if we watch it together, but I find the idea a total turn-off.Suzi Godson's Sex Advice: My wife wants us to watch porn together?

As you probably have heard by now, changes to the rules concerning gift vouchers in Ireland came into effect earlier this month, giving consumers more rights when it comes to these popular items.Making Cents: Play your cards right when giving gift vouchers this Christmas

More From The Irish Examiner