Technological ‘solutions’ pose large-scale risk to environment

Technological ‘solutions’ pose large-scale risk to environment
A girl holds a sign that reads 'pull the emergency brake' as she attends a ceremony in the area which once was the Okjokull glacier, in Iceland, Sunday, Aug. 18, 2019. With poetry, moments of silence and political speeches about the urgent need to fight climate change, Icelandic officials, activists and others bade goodbye to the first Icelandic glacier to disappear. (AP Photo/Felipe Dana)

By Silvia Ribeiro

The only way to know how any so-called geoengineering techniques would affect the climate is to deploy them over several decades on a massive scale, writes Silvia Ribeiro

Although the effects of climate change are becoming increasingly apparent, the progress towards reducing greenhouse-gas emissions remains as disappointing as ever, leading some to tout new technological solutions that could supposedly save the day.

Harvard University’s David Keith, for example, would have us consider geoengineering — deliberate, large-scale, and highly risky interventions in the Earth’s climate system.

This past March at the UN environmental conference in Nairobi, Kenya, the US, and Saudi Arabia blocked an effort to scrutinise geoengineering and its implications for international governance. Meanwhile, Keith’s Stratospheric Controlled Perturbation Experiment (SCoPEx) in the US — which aims to test a form of geoengineering known as solar radiation management (SRM) — seems to be moving forward.

SRM depends on so-called atratospheric aerosol injection, whereby a high-altitude balloon sprays large quantities of inorganic particles into the stratosphere with the goal of reflecting some sunlight back into space. SCoPEx would send a balloon equipped with scientific instruments some 20km above the ground to test the reflectivity of various substances.

But these technical aspects of the experiment are far less important than its political, social, and geopolitical implications. After all, the risks of geoengineering could not be more serious. If deployed at scale, SRM could disrupt the monsoons in Asia and cause droughts in Africa, affecting the food and water supplies of 2bn people. The use of sulfuric acid — the most studied option, and the one SCoPEx initially intended to test — could further deplete the ozone layer. (More recently, SCoPEx has been mentioning only carbonates.)

The recent launch of an independent advisory committee for SCoPEx seems to be aimed at lending legitimacy to a kind of experiment that the rest of the world has agreed is too dangerous to allow. Moreover, the panel’s membership is exclusively US-based, and mostly linked to elite institutions, which raises questions about whose interests are really being served.

These concerns are reinforced by the fact that the SCoPEx pitch is fundamentally manipulative. The results from a “small-scale” experiment would not amount to a credible assessment of the effects of deploying SRM at the scale needed for geoengineering.

As climate scientists have made clear, the only way to know how SRM (or any other geoengineering technique) would affect the climate is to deploy it over several decades on a massive scale.

Otherwise, its effects could not be distinguished from other climate variables and “climate noise”. Given that geoengineering is, by nature, not testable, all experiments like SCoPEx can do is create momentum for larger and longer experiments.

Once millions of euros have been sunk into creating the relevant institutions and employing large numbers of people, it becomes easier to argue that even more data should be collected and, finally, that the technology should be deployed.

In this sense, projects like SCoPEx set a new and dangerous precedent for the unilateral implementation of geoengineering technologies by billionaires and vested interests.

Indeed, as the Centre for International Environmental Law and the Heinrich Boll Foundation’s recent report, Fuel to Fire, points out, fossil-fuel companies have been investing in geoengineering for decades. For them, the promise of a technological get-out-of-jail-free card is an ideal pretext for continuing their highly profitable, destructive activities.

In fact, Keith’s own company, Carbon Engineering, recently received $68m from Occidental Petroleum, Chevron, and the coal giant BHP (Billiton) to develop another potentially dangerous geoengineering approach — direct air capture, which takes CO2 from the atmosphere, to be used or stored. Among the company’s original funders is the oil sands financier N Murray Edwards (as well as Bill Gates).

Allowing such projects to move forward with no political mandate or institutional oversight could entrench a system of self-regulation that is grossly inadequate for technologies as consequential as geoengineering.

That is why the UN Convention on Biodiversity has asked governments not to allow any geoengineering activities to be carried out until “a global, transparent, and effective control and regulatory mechanism” is put in place — one that adheres to the “precautionary approach”.

This decision made an exception for small-scale experiments, but only under certain conditions, which SCoPEx doesn’t meet: Among them, carrying out experiments in “controlled settings” and acquiring the free, prior, and informed consent of indigenous peoples and local communities that may be affected. Furthermore, in the case of SCoPEx, no critical voices from civil society or developing-country governments seem to have been considered.

SCoPEx’s promoters appear determined to take advantage of the US’s failure to ratify the Convention on Biodiversity. The fact that the SCoPEx advisory committee is chaired by a California government official, Louise Bedsworth, also raises the question of whether a state that has positioned itself as a climate leader is now embracing the most controversial form of geoengineering.

Rather than allow fossil-fuel companies that have ravaged our planet for profit to continue to act in their own interest, the world must establish a strong, multilateral democratic regulatory mechanism, which includes the option to ban certain technologies outright.

Until such an international system is in place, experiments like SCoPEx — which threaten to act as a Trojan horse for deploying dangerous technologies at scale — must not be allowed to move forward.

Silvia Ribeiro is Latin America director at the ETC Group. Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2019.

More on this topic

'There is no Planet B' - See some of the climate change protests around the world'There is no Planet B' - See some of the climate change protests around the world

Australia’s acting prime minister calls climate protests ‘just a disruption’Australia’s acting prime minister calls climate protests ‘just a disruption’

Let pupils make own decisions over climate strikes – UK principalLet pupils make own decisions over climate strikes – UK principal

Millions take to streets for global climate strikeMillions take to streets for global climate strike

More in this Section

Letter to the Editor: Farmers have been feebly led by IFA top brassLetter to the Editor: Farmers have been feebly led by IFA top brass

Government backs Apple: Appeal is not in long-term best interestGovernment backs Apple: Appeal is not in long-term best interest

Brexit negotiations stumbling: A disheartening dose of realityBrexit negotiations stumbling: A disheartening dose of reality

Make that call: An emigrant’s lonely deathMake that call: An emigrant’s lonely death


Audrey's been sorting out Cork people for ages.Ask Audrey: C’mere, what’s the story with Chris O’Dowd thinking he’s better than Cork people

So, I put a link to a short story up for my students the other day. The story was by Michael Morpurgo and I was delighted to find an online copy. It can be challenging when you are relying on non-paper texts to teach.Secret diary of an Irish teacher: I love physical books and always will

Celebrated actress Siobhán McSweeney may have found fame starring in a TV series set at the other end of the country, but Cork is never far from her thoughts, writes Ciara McDonnellHome is where the art is for Derry Girls actress

There are literally hundreds of free events on offer this evening for kids and adults on Culture Night. Marjorie Brennan selects the best of them, in Cork and beyondCulture Night: Get out and make the most of it

More From The Irish Examiner