Semi-free press starting to pose different problems for Putin

Semi-free press starting to pose different problems for Putin

The Russian president may not be taking the challenge he faces seriously enough as media shifts away from anti-Western propaganda to highlight people’s frustrations, writes Nina L Khrushcheva.

In his widely broadcast annual press conference last month, Russian president Vladimir Putin was confident and condescending, animated only when criticising Ukraine for skirmishes in the Black Sea or railing against the West’s “unfair” complaints about Russia’s behaviour.

Asserting that America’s withdrawal from the 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty demands that Russia develop new weapons, Putin sneered: “And they should not whine later that we are allegedly trying to gain certain advantages.”

His character was a cross between the Soviet ambassador in Dr Strangelove, promising to close the “Doomsday gap” with the West, and the folkloric Ded Moroz (Father Frost), who miraculously resolves people’s problems.

This is a diminished repertoire for Putin, who has spent the last 18 years playing everything from a caring father-to-the nation to a judo-fighting James Bond. More important, it was less believable than ever.

Putin built his authority on direct contact with Russian society. Early in his presidency, he would traverse all of Russia’s 11 time zones promising — and often delivering — real income growth, better infrastructure, and national renewal. In fact, the recent press conference — the 14th of its kind — looked a lot like another of Putin’s oft-repeated public performances: ‘Direct Line,’ a live broadcast in which he answers (scripted) questions from Russians.

In what was probably also scripted, the press conferences included “journalists” stepping up to ask questions — and then being revealed to be ordinary Russians who had been duped by corrupt officials.

In response to her complaints, one such aggrieved character received Putin’s personal pledge to “look into the problem”.

But, amid falling living standards and increasing global hostility, Putin’s televised promises don’t fool anybody anymore — and not just because of falling confidence in televised news broadcasts (from 79% to 49% over the last decade). Russians also have their doubts about Putin’s leadership itself, as reflected by a sharp decline in his approval rating, from over 76% to 66%, in the last six months. Only 56% of Russians say that they would vote for him if an election were held tomorrow.

Of course, this is not news to the Kremlin, which has been attempting to change its tactics to get voters on side. Instead of counting on Putin’s personal pledges and performances, the authorities have increasingly focused on technocratic indicators of Russia’s development, while playing up the threat posed by the West.

The US, Kremlin-controlled media warn, is withdrawing from decades-old nuclear agreements specifically so that it can nuke Russia. Add to that stories of the horrors of the Second World War, and complaints about living standards, the Kremlin hopes, will seem trifling by comparison.

But Putin may not be taking the challenge he faces seriously enough. During his third presidential term — he is now on his fourth — he focused more on defending his entourage from accusations of corruption or indifference than on keeping ordinary Russians happy.

In true Soviet style, he remains more afraid of a palace coup than a public uprising. His landslide victory in last year’s presidential election reinforced this, as it fed into the classic assumption of the longstanding autocrat: The public will love him no matter what.

The problem with a semi-authoritarian regime like Putin’s, however, is that people’s behaviour is not fully under the leader’s control. And, in today’s Russia, this extends to the news media, which report far more often — and more boldly — on social challenges, and the anger they stoke than outsiders might expect.

The Russian state never actually demanded a positive spin on coverage of social issues. So, when it comes to such issues, the level of free speech is akin to the glasnost (openness) of the 1980s.

Even as media outlets toe the official line on topics relating to Ukraine and the West — not to mention, popular protests led by opposition leader Alexey Navalny — they still highlight people’s frustration with salaries, pensions, housing and parking rules, and taxes, among other issues.

Headlines about Russians’ “loss of faith” in their government, for example, have made it into Russian newspapers such as MK and Kommersant, and onto television networks like NTV. This is no anti-Putin conspiracy; rather, it is the Russian media doing its job, to the extent that a semi-free press can.

Russia’s news business is, after all, a business — one that needs customers to survive. So as media shift away from anti-Western propaganda and stories glorifying the past — which they, unlike the Kremlin, recognise is no longer what readers want — they are not just reporting on social issues; they are concocting their own audience-attracting doomsday headlines. Patriotism may be out, but alarmism is still in.

In this sense, Russia’s press recalls the potentially transformative power of glasnost. In the 1980s, coverage of social and historical injustices went into overdrive, creating a rift between hardliners who claimed to protect the state (reminiscent of the current Kremlin) and those who wanted to accelerate perestroika (restructuring).

The hardliners’ failed 1991 coup hastened the collapse of the Soviet Union.

The Soviet Union failed partly because of the disconnect between ordinary people’s basic needs and the state’s superpower agenda, which made the population poorer. By claiming to defend the Motherland, while ignoring its people, Putin now risks making a similar mistake.

The national newspaper Vedomosti — by no means a liberal outlet — recently reported that Russians today don’t want “survival, but self-expression”. They want “protection by the law, respect, and a peaceful foreign policy”.

More on this topic

Planes land in Russia-Ukraine prisoner swapPlanes land in Russia-Ukraine prisoner swap

Watch: Sprinkler hoses Russian journalist in face during live sports reportWatch: Sprinkler hoses Russian journalist in face during live sports report

Russia’s floating nuclear power plant begins journey to destinationRussia’s floating nuclear power plant begins journey to destination

Russia's opposition leader Alexei Navalny released after month in prisonRussia's opposition leader Alexei Navalny released after month in prison

More in this Section

No regrets from Irishmen behind blood-soaked massacre at AmritsarNo regrets from Irishmen behind blood-soaked massacre at Amritsar

Family poverty - One-parent homes need more supportFamily poverty - One-parent homes need more support

Duty-frees restored - Common Travel Area is the sameDuty-frees restored - Common Travel Area is the same

Politics borrows fad from business - Pause for thoughtPolitics borrows fad from business - Pause for thought


Lifestyle

I’m giggling but also it is tinged with tension. I peep out from behind the large sycamore. They are three trees away.Opening Lines: I’m just a bearded wheezing giggly man on the ground

I did my Leaving Cert in June and have just started college this week, so my school experience is extremely fresh in my memory. I went to Davis College in Mallow and it was a fantastic experience. I was the loud obnoxious child at the back of the classroom from day one. I had to (and still do, by the way) have an opinion on everything.Stand up and be counted : The Young Offender's Demi Isaac Oviawe on college and school life

When I was in secondary school I started working part-time as a waitress and I suppose I caught the hospitality bug back then.You've been served: General manager at Inchydoney Island Lodge & Spa Caitriona O’Keeffe

That an American study has found straight women prefer dad bods (“an untoned and slightly plump male physique, especially one that is considered attractive”) to six packs and hard shiny abs comes as no great surprise.Outside the Box: Tone down guys, us girls don’t mind moobs

More From The Irish Examiner