Language and politics: May in the abstract

Amid the torrent of news gushing out from Britain’s barely functioning government, the worldwide community of prime ministers and presidents, and students of political linguistics, might not have had their attention drawn to an exchange between Ms May and the chairman of a House of Commons select committee.

The prime minister, reminded of her Lancaster House Brexit speech in 2017, was asked last week if she would contemplate Britain leaving the European Union without a divorce agreement.

“I stand,” she replied, “by the references I have made in the past that no deal is better than a bad deal.”

After which, she added a helpful elucidation: “When I first made that reference, I was talking in the abstract.”

It’s possible to imagine now Thomas Jefferson, chief draughtsman of the 1776 Declaration of Independence being questioned today by a US senator.

This stuff, he might be asked — and we paraphrase — about all men being created equal, with unalienable rights including life and liberty.

Leaving happiness out of it, where did that leave women and slaves?

“Ah,” says Jefferson helpfully, “when I wrote that, I was writing in the abstract. Didn’t I make that clear?” 

More on this topic

Tory leadership race: nine potential candidates for UK prime minister

May’s days numbered after British cabinet mutiny over her Brexit plan

Finance minister: Risk of no-deal Brexit is growing

The threat of Brexiteer Boris as prime minister haunts Irish shares

More in this Section

As ballot papers expand, is it time to reassess political nomination process?

Using your smartphone at the supermarket can add 41% to your shopping bill

Five things to look out for in the European elections

Blue Flag beaches: Prized assets


Weekend Food: Darina Allen introduces you to some of her favourite Sri Lankan dishes

More From The Irish Examiner