Eighth Amendment debate - Good example

When the history of the campaigns around the Eighth Amendment come to be written, last week’s Dáil announcement by Fianna Fáil leader Micheál Martin that he would vote to remove Article 40.3.3 to allow for terminations up to 12 weeks may get a paragraph.

The fact that he made the announcement without giving prior knowledge to his parliamentary colleagues may get a footnote — maybe.

It was inevitable that such an announcement would cause division, as was confirmed by last evening’s meeting of “concerned” FF TDs , but what was not inevitable was how his Dáil and constituency colleague, Micheal McGrath, reacted. McGrath expressed surprise at the way the announcement was made and confirmed that he could not support his leader’s position.

This was done without acrimony or the hysteria that has driven so much of this decades-long debate. The issue was not personalised. The ball, not the man, was played.

As we batten down the hatches for the coming storm, we should thank them for showing that this debate need not be as destructively divisive as it has been.

More in this Section

Drone warning: Dublin Airport closure

Pontiff’s mixed message: Time to mind the language

Readers Blog: Letters from students at Schull Community School, Co Cork

Risks from automation: Rural areas need vision to survive


Live music review: Chvrches play a blinder at the Olympia

7 ways to manage toddler tantrums, according to an expert

Ask Audrey: 'I'm pretending to be from Monkstown, but I'm really just a wan from Turners Cross'

Six questions from a first-time viewer of MasterChef

More From The Irish Examiner