Eighth Amendment debate - Good example

When the history of the campaigns around the Eighth Amendment come to be written, last week’s Dáil announcement by Fianna Fáil leader Micheál Martin that he would vote to remove Article 40.3.3 to allow for terminations up to 12 weeks may get a paragraph.

The fact that he made the announcement without giving prior knowledge to his parliamentary colleagues may get a footnote — maybe.

It was inevitable that such an announcement would cause division, as was confirmed by last evening’s meeting of “concerned” FF TDs , but what was not inevitable was how his Dáil and constituency colleague, Micheal McGrath, reacted. McGrath expressed surprise at the way the announcement was made and confirmed that he could not support his leader’s position.

This was done without acrimony or the hysteria that has driven so much of this decades-long debate. The issue was not personalised. The ball, not the man, was played.

As we batten down the hatches for the coming storm, we should thank them for showing that this debate need not be as destructively divisive as it has been.

More in this Section

The moral hazard of mortgage defaulters

Mortgage arrears: Edmund Honohan poses a good question

Garda Policing Plan: Don’t put off essential reform

Death of Billy Graham: Bona fide voice


Join the conversation - comment here

House rules for comments - FAQ


Today's Stories

Man jailed for damaging headstones

Citizens’ Assembly chair rejects criticism of 8th report

450 people had welfare payments suspended

Government ‘satisfied’ with Brexit backstop


The biggest cancer killer will take your breath away

Hopefully she had an idea...

Power of the press: Meryl Streep and Tom Hanks discuss 'The Post'

More From The Irish Examiner