Government with lessons to learn: special needs education

Government with lessons to learn: special needs education
A recent survey has found that almost nine in 10 school principals say they do not agree with the Department of Education forcing a school to open a special needs class against its wishes. Picture: Ben Birchall/PA

Lingering recession-era cutbacks mean that, when a teacher is absent, children with special needs often lose out, writes Michael Clifford.

You will search long and hard to find a lobby group which will admit that those it represents have it good. After all, the whole purpose of lobbying is to get a better deal. Therefore, any survey undertaken by a lobby group among its members should come with a health warning.

However, even taking such a warning into account, the survey of primary school principals about the provision of special needs education points to a system that is simply not fit for purpose.

The survey by the National Principals Forum (NPF) group shows a school system in which the level of provision in special education is simply not meeting the need. The NPF was set up last year in response to growing frustration among principals at what they regard as the diminution of their roles in an environment of greatly increased workload.

  • Among the most shocking statistics in the survey, to which over one in four principals in the country responded, are:

  • 73% of principals have had to regularly use a special education teacher to cover absences;
  • Almost nine of 10 schools receive less support for children with additional needs than was the case in 2012;
  • 64% of principals report that a child has hurt a member of staff;
  • 89% say they do not agree with the department forcing a school to open a special class against its wishes;
  • 53% say they have placed at least one child on a shortened day;
  • 96% believe that media coverage of shortened days has been unfair.

Special needs education has been receiving enhanced coverage in the media over the last year, particularly in relation to the provision of places. Most of that coverage has been from the perspective of parents who endure constant struggles and battles to get a proper education for their children. The Inclusion Illusion offers some perspective from the point of view of those running the schools.

The finding that three-quarters of principals regularly used a special education teacher to cover absences is a shocking indictment. This is directly attributable to cutbacks in the provisions for substitute teachers made during the recession.

So now it would appear that in the instance of an unexpected absence — which occurs in all workplaces — the first casualty is the provision of special education. The children most in need in this respect are those whose needs are sacrificed first.

If, as appears to be the case, principals have no choice in this matter, it falls back on the department to address it in a structured manner. In terms of the provision of places, the finding that the overwhelming majority of principals don’t want a special class forced on their school raises all sorts of questions.

Why would a special class have to be forced on a school? Is there a fear that if such a class were initiated, it would impinge on the mainstream education? Is there a fear that a special class would not receive the resources required for it to function properly?

The other matter receiving coverage in recent months was that of children with special or additional needs being put on shortened days. Last month, a report carried out by Technological University Dublin found that one in three pupils with autism were being placed on shorter school days.

The report suggested that this was a form of “behaviour management” by schools. Quite obviously from the survey, principals feel this coverage reflected poorly on them in an unfair manner. What emerges from the survey is that principals are adamant that they do not have sufficient supports for special education, forcing them to resort to an ad hoc shortened day policy.

All of these issues within special education point to a system in which principals are constantly firefighting. Every time the provision of special education comes up, the stock response from Government is to trot out figures that illustrate how there are so many more places — and resources — available today than was the case in 2011.

Yet the NPF survey points to a belief among principals that they have fewer resources today than seven years ago.

The reality is that more money is being put towards the sector today, but only because it was starting from such a low base. It is also the case that those entitled to special education today would not have been back in the days when the whole area was treated as something to be swept under the carpet.

If the principals’ perceptions and opinions are correct, then the level of resources required is simply not being met. That would be a scandal, and one that simply will not be contained behind closed doors for too much longer.

More on this topic

40% of Travellers in further education have only completed primary level40% of Travellers in further education have only completed primary level

Lack of funding prevents roll-out of Chinese as school subjectLack of funding prevents roll-out of Chinese as school subject

Call for debate on ‘place of technology’ in schoolsCall for debate on ‘place of technology’ in schools

Irish students among world's best readers, but more say they do not read for funIrish students among world's best readers, but more say they do not read for fun

More in this Section

Tara Flynn: I don’t trust ‘nice’. I prefer to be honest, outspoken, and kindTara Flynn: I don’t trust ‘nice’. I prefer to be honest, outspoken, and kind

Cormac O'Keeffe: Modern-day Fagins use kids to deal their drugsCormac O'Keeffe: Modern-day Fagins use kids to deal their drugs

Irish climb quality-of-life rankings: We’re third in the world but unhappyIrish climb quality-of-life rankings: We’re third in the world but unhappy

Tourists the ubiquitous witnesses: No escapeTourists the ubiquitous witnesses: No escape

More by this author

Michael Clifford: No going back for new British projectMichael Clifford: No going back for new British project

Michael Clifford: Age is just a number but it keeps adding upMichael Clifford: Age is just a number but it keeps adding up

When chips are down politicians deliverWhen chips are down politicians deliver

Decrepit public services are the big issueDecrepit public services are the big issue


Lifestyle

Lizzo, Demi Lovato and Ashley Graham are among those prompting us to practise a little more self-love.5 times celebrities reminded us to be body positive in 2019

Wondering about wine for the big day? Leslie Williams has all the options, for every taste and budget.Something from the bar: The perfect drink selections this Christmas

Damon Smith faces the might of the First Order on the exhilarating Star Wars Rise Of The Resistance attraction at Walt Disney World in Orlando.Feeling the Force in Florida: Star Wars Rise Of The Resistance attraction opens at Walt Disney World

There’s nothing better than curling up with a good book over the Christmas holidays, says Kya deLongchamps.By the book: Our top home and interiors picks to curl up with over the festive season

More From The Irish Examiner