SUZANNE HARRINGTON: My only WFH rule is to avoid full frontal nudity

You may have recently heard about the WSJ lecturing the WFH, and thought WTF. I certainly did. 

I mean, it’s not like I read the Wall Street Journal, but its recent pronouncements on what those who Work From Home should wear — $4,000 earrings paired with $3,000 handbags, because “vanished are the days when working from home meant being invisible” — left me and countless other WFH types (or “slobby creatives”, as the WSJ calls us) scratching our unicorn onesies. Sweatpants, says the WSJ — by which they mean trackie bottoms — are not appropriate for working from home. I agree.

Why would you want to get that dressed up, when you can wear whatever you slept in, perhaps adding a blanket so your knees don’t get cold? In fact, if you have a laptop, why get out of bed at all? Why such formal verticality?

Sign in or register for FREE to continue enjoying and to comment on our great range of opinion writers

Not a member yet? Register here

More on this topic

More in this Section

Uphill battle against Trump’s emergency

Asleep at the wheel on public projects

It’s time to fire the three monkeys: Silence is still an engine of subjugation

Insect populations collapsing: We’re codding ourselves again

More by this author

Marie Kondo clean out sparks more confusion than joy

I’ve had enough of red lines and backstops

Addictions must be treated, not glamorised

Razor ad too close to bone for fragile men


Want to have a whale of a time? IWDG bringing Iceland expedition stories to libraries

Mature students should start on grant applications

Rosamund Pike’s battle to portray war reporter Marie Colvin

Other side of Gaza: Irish film-makers highlight ordinary lives in the besieged territory

More From The Irish Examiner