Why Republicans won’t stop another political shutdown

Why Republicans won’t stop another political shutdown

Republicans aren’t preparing for another shutdown because they don’t want to believe that one is possible — but that’s what they thought last time too, says Ramesh Ponnuru.

Republicans are already working to lose the next government shutdown.

On NBC’s Meet the Press last Sunday, House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy denied that US President Donald Trump had shut down the government.

The shutdown — which started December 22 and lasted until last Friday —was, he said, the decision of the Democrats’ Senate leader, Charles Schumer of New York.

The same morning, acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney was asked on CBS’s Face the Nation whether the president is “really prepared to shut down the government again in three weeks,” when funding for some of its operations runs out.

Mulvaney’s response?

Yeah. I think he actually is

Shutdowns typically result in failure for the party that is blamed for starting them, and the party that gets blamed is typically the one that is seeking to use legislation that keeps the government funded to enact a policy change.

The odds were therefore against Trump’s hope that the latest shutdown would end with new funding for a wall, or even increased physical barriers, on the Mexican border.

The odds would have been against Republicans even if they had made a sustained and consistent case that they were trying to keep the government open but were being thwarted by stubborn Democrats who refused to give them an inch of fencing.

But the Republicans did not make that effort. Instead they made three errors that reduced their chances of success still further.

    First: They engaged in no political preparation for the shutdown. The White House in December put out the word that Trump would sign a government-funding bill without extra money for the wall, and then close to the last minute the president decided to insist on that money.

    Second: Some of them actively and preemptively took responsibility for the shutdown. Trump famously told Schumer and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi that he would take the heat for the shutdown.

    Third: They continued to broadcast duelling messages throughout the shutdown. (It was no problem for most Americans, and it was a tragedy caused by the Democrats.)

Almost everyone agrees that Trump and the Republicans lost the political battle over the shutdown. Trump agreed to fund the government for another three weeks with no added border security.

All he seems to have gotten is slightly worse polling numbers (based on the RealClear Politics average).

Amazingly, Republicans are making the exact same mistakes now, even as Trump threatened on Sunday to close the US government again to get his wall.

They are not preparing for the possibility of another shutdown in a few weeks. The conventional wisdom, which many of them are promoting, is that this fight is over. They are not trying to avoid blame for another shutdown, as Mulvaney’s comment shows. And they are not getting on the same page, as McCarthy and Mulvaney just demonstrated.

Republicans aren’t preparing for another shutdown because they don’t want to believe one is possible

Congressional Republicans generally think it won’t happen because it would be crazy for Trump to precipitate it. But that’s what they thought last time, too.

Republicans in the US Congress can take two steps to avert a shutdown. One is to reach a deal on border issues with their Democratic counterparts before government funding runs out, and sell the president on it.

The other is to communicate to Trump that if he tries to use another shutdown to get his way, enough of them will vote with the Democrats to keep the government open that any veto would be overridden.

They’re not going to take that second step, no matter how many pundits tell them to do it, because they’re not willing to deliver on the threat.

Why Republicans won’t stop another political shutdown

They don’t want another shutdown, but they want a bitter party split even less. And that’s what breaking with Trump on a shutdown would be: a declaration that congressional Republicans will work with congressional Democrats to sideline Trump.

Trump would — understandably — respond by lashing out at Republican traitors. Republicans have no intention of entering the 2020 election cycle that way.

So while Republicans in the US Congress and the Trump administration do not want another shutdown, and have every reason to expect another shutdown would end no better for them than the last one did, they have effectively resigned themselves to the fact that whether there will be one and what role they will play in it depends on the whims of the president.

This is not the place they want to be, but at least it is a familiar one.

More in this Section

Letter to the Editor: Farmers have been feebly led by IFA top brassLetter to the Editor: Farmers have been feebly led by IFA top brass

Government backs Apple: Appeal is not in long-term best interestGovernment backs Apple: Appeal is not in long-term best interest

Brexit negotiations stumbling: A disheartening dose of realityBrexit negotiations stumbling: A disheartening dose of reality

Make that call: An emigrant’s lonely deathMake that call: An emigrant’s lonely death


Lifestyle

Against popular wisdom and flying a plane made from bamboo, wire and bike handlebars, a Co Antrim woman blazed a sky trail for aviation and for the independence of women, writes Bette BrowneMagnificent Lilian Bland blazed a trail for independence of women in her plane of bamboo

The epic battle for the bridge at Arnhem, as depicted in the blockbuster 'A Bridge Too Far', saw the Allies aim to end the war by Christmas 1944, but failed as a huge airborne assault force failed to take the last bridge across the Rhine. In an extract from his latest book 'A Bloody Week', Dan Harvey tells the story of one of the hundreds of brave men from Ireland who gave their all to the Allied campaignThe bridge to war: Dan Harvey's new book looks at the Irish who went a bridge too far

More From The Irish Examiner