Supreme Court to hear Denis O'Brien's appeal over Dáil statements

By Ann O'Loughlin

Businessman Denis O'Brien's appeal against the dismissal of his action against the Dáil and State over statements made by two TDs in the Dáil about his banking affairs will open before a seven-judge Supreme Court on Monday.

Mr O’Brien is also appealing an order requiring him to pay the estimated €1m legal costs of his failed High Court action.

His appeal, listed for two days, follows a separate Supreme Court appeal by former Rehab CEO Angela Kerins against the rejection of her challenge over her treatment at two Dáil Public Accounts Committee hearings into payments to Rehab.

Both appeals raise similar issues concerning the constitutional separation of powers and the courts’ ability to intervene in decisions and proceedings of Houses and Committees of the Oireachtas.

Ms Kerins' appeal was heard over four days last month and judgment was reserved by the seven-judge court comprising the Chief Justice, Mr Justice Frank Clarke, Mr Justice Donal O'Donnell, Mr Justice William McKechnie, Mr Justice John McMenamin, Ms Justice Elizabeth Dunne, Ms Justice Iseult O'Malley and Ms Justice Mary Finlay Geoghegan

The PAC’s appeal against the High Court’s decision directing it to pay Ms Kerins’ estimated €700,000 costs of the case there, plus the State’s appeal over an order requiring it to pay its own costs, will be dealt with after the Supreme Court has given judgment.

The same seven judges will hear Mr O'Brien's appeal, brought against the clerk of the Dáil, the Dáil Committee on Procedures and Privileges and the State.

His proceedings arose from statements made on separate dates in summer 2015 by Social Democrats TD Catherine Murphy and Sinn Féin TD Pearse Doherty after Mr O'Brien got court injunctions restraining RTE publicising that information.

In her March 2017 High Court judgment dismissing the case, Ms Justice Una Ni Raifeartaigh held that what Mr O’Brien sought was prohibited by the separation of powers under the Constitution and would have a "chilling effect" on parliamentary speech into the future.

She upheld the core defence argument that Article 15 of the Constitution immunises Dáil "utterances" from suit or scrutiny by courts or tribunals and later awarded the estimated €1m costs of the action against Mr O’Brien.

More on this topic

Pub to pay man €3,500 compensation to customer with brain tumour

Judge orders boy to move home due to mother passing on 'hateful feelings' about father

Billionaire's daughter pleads guilty in cult sex slave case

Two men due in court over €1.3m drug seizure in Co Waterford

More in this Section

Number of learner drivers who have never sat test 'shocking', says CEO of RSA

New IRA: Dissident republican group linked with four murders

Delay in fighting Donegal gorse fire due to crews coming from 'all over the country' - Air Corps

Woman arrested in connection with Lyra McKee murder as New IRA admits responsibility


Lifestyle

Ask a counsellor: My husband has a drink problem – what do I do?

Vicky McClure sings out about dementia on BBC

More From The Irish Examiner