Gardaí never investigated State official's destruction of documents, trial hears

Gardaí have never investigated a State official's destruction of documents related to the investigation of alleged crimes by former Anglo Irish Bank chairman Sean Fitzpatrick, a trial has heard.

Mr FitzPatrick (aged 68) is on trial at Dublin Circuit Criminal Court accused of misleading auditors about multi-million euro loans in the years 2002 to 2007.

The jury has already heard that in May 2015 Kevin O'Connell, a lead investigator from the Office of Director of Corporate Enforcement (ODCE), shredded documents which were relevant to the investigation.

He told Bernard Condon SC, defending, that he panicked when he discovered the five pages in his office and made a wrong decision to destroy them. He admitted it was unethical and said he was ashamed of his actions.

He said he disclosed his actions to his boss, director of corporate enforcement Ian Drennan, three days later.

This morning Mr Condon began a sixth day of cross-examining Mr O'Connell. The witness agreed that it was a criminal offence to destroy documents relevant to an investigation.

He also agreed that there had been no garda investigation into his shredding of the documents.

He said when he told Mr Drennan about his actions he did so knowing it could have led to very serious outcomes such as criminal investigations or disciplinary proceedings.

He agreed with counsel that none of these things happened.

Mr Condon said there had been no garda investigation and hence there had been no prosecution.

He said that at the start of the current trial last October the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) offered Mr O'Connell what counsel described as “effective immunity” from prosecution.

This offer came while Mr O'Connell was giving evidence during legal argument and he indicated to the court that he may wish to rely on the privilege against self incrimination.

Mr Condon told the jury that this was a legal right available here and known in the U.S. “as pleading the fifth”, where a person does not have to answer a question that may incriminate them.

On October 12 last, 2016 the Chief Prosecution Solicitor for the DPP wrote to solicitors for Mr O'Connell stating that no evidence given by him concerning the destruction of documents would be used in evidence in any criminal proceedings against him.

The court heard that lawyers for the DPP have firmly rejected that the letter amounted to an immunity against prosecution. Mr Condon submitted that it was a qualified but “effective” immunity.

Mr FitzPatrick of Whitshed Road, Greystones, Co Wicklow has pleaded not guilty to 27 offences under the 1990 Companies Act.

These include 22 charges of making a misleading, false or deceptive statement to auditors and five charges of furnishing false information in the years 2002 to 2007.

The trial continues before Judge John Aylmer and a jury.

Related Articles

Calls to publish FitzPatrick trial collapse report

More in this Section

Two men arrested in investigation into Derry armed robbery

European Parliament backs proposals to help those who lose their passports when travelling outside the EU

Belfast site named after women who campaigned against plastic bullets

Stephen Donnelly urges Health Minister to act to avert ambulance strike


What’s better for your health – sleeping naked or in pyjamas?

Fixing leeks in the cold snap

How some home truths can help save the planet

Wish List: Some delightfully eclectic products we need in our lives

More From The Irish Examiner