Dept of Health 'must get a grip' on 'defects' in junior doctor recruitment - President of High Court

Generic image of doctors at work

The president of the High Court has said the Department of Health must urgently address the “clear defects” in the processes being used for recruiting junior hospital doctors in hospitals nationwide.

The Department "must get a grip" on this pattern of defects, which has implications for patient safety, "sooner rather than later", Mr Justice Peter Kelly said.

He made the comments after making orders striking off the medical register here a Pakistani doctor who worked in hospitals in Mullingar and Tallaght and was found to have forged three “glowing” references from consultants in those hospitals to help him get highly placed registrar positions in emergency medicine.

The judge separately struck off a Romanian doctor recruited by Dublin's Rotunda Hospital as an anaesthetic registrar in late 2015 on foot of her 2002 qualification for anaesthesia in Romania.

Following an adverse outcome for a patient in the Rotunda, anaesthetic consultants became concerned and they administered a competency test to the doctor, normally applied to first year trainee students in anaesthesia after their first 12 weeks, which she "spectacularly"" failed, the judge noted.

These were not the first such cases before the court to expose defects in recruitment processes and he had previously drawn attention to those defects, he said.

The Department of Health must have a concern about the integrity of the recruitment process because it is “simply not fair” that patients going into hospitals cannot repose confidence in doctors, he said.

There is "something seriously wrong" if references are not validated, he said.

Noting there is a dispute whether a locum agency is required to verify the qualification of doctors on a hospital payroll as well as on the agency's books, the judge said, when it comes to responsibility for checking references, there is no distinction between doctors.

If a hospital is going to use any doctor, they must verify their competency and references, he said.

JP McDowell, solicitor for the Medical Council, who had asked the court to confirm the cancellation of both doctor's registrations, said the Council shared the judge's concerns, is in talks with the HSE about the matter, and would ensure the court's concerns are drawn to the Department's attention.

The first case before the judge yesterday (Mon) concerned Dr Syed Basit Ahmed, a doctor from Pakistan with an address at College Hill, Mullingar.

He had worked in hospitals in Mullingar and Tallaght and the Council sought to have him struck off after he was found guilty of professional misconduct following an inquiry of the Council's Fitness to Practice Committee over forging three references in his favour in the names of three different consultants, one at Mullingar, and two at Tallaght hospital.

Dr Ahmed, who denied forgery, had not attended the inquiry after his request for being refused a private hearing of that.

The first reference was dated September 2013 and the other two were dated December 2016.

The forgeries came to light after Dr Ahmed applied to Letterkenny hospital for a position in 2017 and an "eagle-eyed" consultant there became suspicious about the terms of the references provided, the judge noted.

All three consultants told the FTPC inquiry they had not provided any reference.

All said they would have been prepared to give Dr Ahmed a reference but not in the "glowing" terms of the references at issue.

The FTPC found the misconduct was aggravated by Dr Ahmed's denial he forged the references and his insistence his email containing the references was hacked into.

The second case concerned Dr Eunicia Ursu, of Timisoara, Timis, Romania, who was also found guilty of professional misconduct following a separate FTPC inquiry held arising from complaints made in July 2016 by three consultants anaesthetists at the Rotunda Hospital.

She did not attend the inquiry and is believed to be back in Romania.

The Committee found she was guilty of poor professional peformance in that, while employed as a registrar in anaesthetics at the Rotunda between January and July 2016, she failed to demonstrate sufficient skill and/or knowledge as would be expected from a registrar in anaesthetics.

It also found professional misconduct in that she, in applying for the position of registrar in anaesthetics in Cork University Hospital in September 2016, deliberately failed to refer to her period of employment at the Rotunda in circumstances where she knew, or should have known, she was unlikely to get any favourable reference from the Rotunda should it be contacted by CUH.

In his ruling on Monday, Mr Justice Kelly said he fully endorsed the views of the FTPC that both doctors should have their registrations cancelled for reasons including protection of the public.

More on this topic

Biker’s death a stupid waste of a young man’s life, says partner

Children accused of biscuit theft awarded €14k in damages

Drug dealer showed no remorse for vicious assault in nightclub

Court hears civil servant accused of breaking Official Secrets Act admitted he had 'a peek' at Butterly murder file

More in this Section

Legislation planned to protect long-term renters from eviction

Family of man missing on Everest launch fundraising campaign

Less than half of litter fines paid, report finds

‘Limited’ increases could damage Defence Forces morale


Lifestyle

Review: Murder of Garcia Lorca gives backdrop to chilling tale

Harris returns 20 years later to magical characters of ‘Chocolat’

Michelle Darmody: Baking with herbs

Product Watch: Skincare acids not as scary as they seem

More From The Irish Examiner