Samsung must pay for patent breach

Samsung must pay for patent breach

After a year of scorched-earth litigation, a US jury decided that Samsung ripped off the innovative technology used by Apple to create its revolutionary iPhone and iPad.

The jury ordered Samsung to pay Apple $1.05bn (€839.16m). An appeal is expected.

Apple filed its patent infringement lawsuit in April 2011 and engaged legions of the country’s highest-paid patent lawyers to demand $2.5bn (€1.99bn) from its top smartphone competitor.

Samsung Electronics fired back with its own lawsuit seeking $399m (€318.88m).

During closing arguments, Apple attorney Harold McElhinny claimed Samsung was having a “crisis of design” after the 2007 launch of the iPhone, and executives with the South Korean company were determined to illegally cash in on the success of the revolutionary device.

Samsung’s lawyers countered that it was simply and legally giving consumers what they want: Smart phones with big screens. They said Samsung did not violate any of Apple’s patents and further alleged innovations claimed by Apple were actually created by other companies.

Samsung has emerged as one of Apple’s biggest rivals and has overtaken Apple as the leading smartphone maker.

Samsung’s Galaxy line of phones run on Android, a mobile operating system that Google has given out for free to Samsung and other phone makers.

Samsung conceded that Apple makes great products but said it does not have a monopoly on the design of rectangle phones with rounded corners that it claimed it created.

The trial came after each side filed a blizzard of legal motions and refused advisories by US District Judge Lucy Koh to settle the dispute out of court.

Deliberations by the jury of seven men and two women began on Wednesday.

Samsung has sold 22.7 million smartphones and tablets that Apple claimed uses its technology. Mr McElhinny said those devices accounted for $8.16bn (€6.52bn) in sales since June 2010.

Apple and Samsung combined account for more than half of global smartphone sales.

As part of its lawsuit, Apple also demanded that Samsung pull its most popular mobile phones and computer tablets from the US market.

From the beginning, legal experts and Wall Street analysts viewed Samsung as the underdog in the case.

Apple’s headquarters is a mere 10 miles from the courthouse, and jurors were picked from the heart of Silicon Valley where Apple’s late founder Steve Jobs is a revered technological pioneer.

While the legal and technological issues were complex, patent expert Alexander I. Poltorak previously said the case would likely boil down to whether jurors believe Samsung’s products look and feel almost identical to Apple’s iPhone and iPad.

To overcome that challenge at trial, Samsung’s lawyers argued that many of Apple’s claims of innovation were either obvious concepts or ideas stolen from Sony and others. Experts called that line of argument a high-risk strategy because of Apple’s reputation as an innovator.

Apple’s lawyers argued there is almost no difference between Samsung products and those of Apple, and presented internal Samsung documents they said showed it copied Apple designs.

Samsung lawyers insisted that several other companies and inventors had previously developed much of the Apple technology at issue.

The US trial is just the latest skirmish between the two tech giants over product designs. Previous legal battles were fought in Australia, the United Kingdom and Germany.

The US case is one of some 50 lawsuits among myriad telecommunications companies jockeying for position in the burgeoning $219bn (€175.02bn) market for smartphones and computer tablets.

More in this Section

Covid-19: Ryanair to take €300m hit, but still in profitCovid-19: Ryanair to take €300m hit, but still in profit

Dire US jobs numbers drive further selloff for global markets amid Covid-19 falloutDire US jobs numbers drive further selloff for global markets amid Covid-19 fallout

Pressure builds on insurer FBD over dividend payout amid Covid-19 crisisPressure builds on insurer FBD over dividend payout amid Covid-19 crisis

Penneys owner cuts executive salariesPenneys owner cuts executive salaries


Lifestyle

Sorting out Posh Cork for ages!Ask Audrey: 'I'll end up looking like a woman from Kanturk'

Cork architect Loïc Dehaye tells Eve Kelliher how he created his dream home from a blank canvas.'It was like this house was waiting for us': Cork architect talks creating his dream home

Keeping to a routine can be difficult for people in quarantine.Life on the inside: 10 ways to start your day right in lockdown

Who needs a gym when you can look in your kitchen cupboards for equipment instead?Don’t have weights for working out? These household objects will do the trick

More From The Irish Examiner