It will be a long, hard journey back to democracy for Turkey

The opposition leader’s 25-day walk from Ankara to Istanbul had much support, but is unlikely to bring change, writes Sinan Ülgen.                  

In Turkey, where President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s government has been centralising political power, opposition parties have had few reasons to be optimistic. This month’s massive rally in Istanbul was a rare
exception.

On July 9, after walking for 25 days from the capital, Ankara, Turkey’s main opposition leader, Kemal Kiliçdaroglu, urged supporters to resist the decline in democratic freedoms.

“We will be breaking down the walls of fear,” Mr Kiliçdaroglu told a crowd of hundreds of thousands. “The last day of our justice march is a new beginning, a new step.”

The question now is whether Turkey’s divided political opposition can move beyond rhetoric, and mount a meaningful, unified challenge to Mr Erdogan’s political hegemony.

The party that Mr Kiliçdaroglu leads, the Republican People’s Party (CHP), commands a high level of support from Turks frustrated by Mr Erdogan’s majority rule. But in Turkey’s constrained political environment, and with a popular, if polarising, president still at the helm, opposition leaders face a struggle to maintain the momentum they have established.

When I spoke with Mr Kiliçdaroglu, a few days before his arrival in Istanbul, as he approached the city limits, he sounded as surprised as anyone by the protest’s size, and was keenly aware of the difficulties that loomed.

The march was an unplanned reaction to the arrest of Enis Berberoglu, a former editor-in chief of the mainstream Hürriyet newspaper, and a CHP member of parliament.

However, the march’s more concrete objectives, like its route, became known only after the 450km protest got underway. By the time Mr Kiliçdaroglu arrived in Istanbul, marchers were calling for economic equity, educational opportunity, gender equality, and a guarantee of non-discrimination on the basis of ethnicity, religion, or cultural identity.

Mr Kiliçdaroglu, meanwhile, said his goal was the complete remodelling of the Turkish state, with clear limits on executive authority by a re-empowered parliament, an impartial judiciary, and a free media. Forging a coherent political platform from such a diverse array of objectives will test the CHP leadership.

In recent years, spontaneous demonstrations, like the one just completed, have not delivered the reforms participants have sought.

In May, 2013, for example, huge crowds gathered to challenge the government’s plans to develop Istanbul’s Gezi Park; the demonstrations ended with no real political impact. A similar outcome is possible this time.

Nonetheless, polling numbers seem to suggest that the public is increasingly behind Kiliçdaroglu. According to a survey published by Research Istanbul on the day of the rally, support for the march was 43%, which is about 17 percentage points higher than the CHP’s approval ratings.

In other words, CHP marchers drew support from outside their base, a sign of Turkey’s deepening disillusionment with the status quo.

Supporters included members of the pro-Kurdish People’s Democratic Party (HDP), 83% of whom approved of the protest. It resonated with members of Mr Erdogan’s own Justice and Development Party (AKP), too; 10% of AKP members surveyed said they supported the march’s objectives.

With his unexpected, unplanned civil disobedience, Mr Kiliçdaroglu seems to have consolidated his role as the leader of a larger, somewhat fragmented, opposition. In the year since last July’s failed coup, the government’s inevitable, but overly heavy-handed response has alienated many Turks.

With emergency rule still in effect, a growing segment of the public, it seems, is receptive to the opposition’s calls to strengthen the rule of law.

Mr Erdogan’s narrow victory in April’s constitutional referendum, which granted the president sweeping new powers to dissolve Parliament, issue decrees, and unilaterally appoint judges, deepened the opposition’s resolve. But it also helped push more Turks into the opposition’s embrace.

According to a Research Istanbul survey, among those who voted “no” to the referendum, 85% stood with Mr Kiliçdaroglu marchers. Tellingly, 7% of those who voted “yes” did as well.

It is too early to speculate whether Mr Kiliçdaroglu’s march will have a lasting impact on Turkey’s political direction. But, at the very least, it has reframed expectations for the country’s next presidential election, now scheduled for November 2019.

But even with the modest gains made earlier this month, Mr Erdogan remains a formidable opponent, and there is still a long road to walk if Mr Kiliçdaroglu’s “new beginning” for Turkey is to be realised.

Sinan Ülgen is executive chairman of the Istanbul-based Center for Economics and Foreign Policy Studies, and a visiting scholar at Carnegie Europe in Brussels.
Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2017.

© Irish Examiner Ltd. All rights reserved

Email Updates

Receive our lunchtime briefing straight to your inbox

More in this Section

Was whistleblower status the real reason for meeting of top brass?

Diaspora not a political burden but political leverage in post-Brexit EU

Munster technological university would result in top honours

Turkey’s fragile democracy under threat following year of turmoil


 

Join the conversation - comment here

House rules for comments - FAQ

 

Breaking Stories

Dublin couple land €112,000 lotto windfall after family day out in Wexford

Garda wore wig and sunglasses while sending anonymous email, trial told

Closing arguments made in double murder trial

Gardaí investigating after man drives through field of cattle, killing two

Lifestyle

Ask Audrey: The new girlfriend is mad for us to try make-up sex. Where is a good place to buy make-up?

In the name of love ... Is this U2s biggest fan?

GentleBirth method already helping mums 'wired for fear' before childbirth

More From The Irish Examiner