Cycling bodies consider Lance confession fall-out

The fall-out from Lance Armstrong’s expected doping confession is already being considered as the world awaits the broadcast of the disgraced cyclist’s interview with Oprah Winfrey.

The talk-show host has already revealed Armstrong came clean over his sordid past, which saw him stripped of his seven Tour de France titles and banned for life, in their interview in his home city of Austin, Texas on Monday.

The 41-year-old was banned for life after the United States Anti-Doping Agency found he had been at the heart of “the most sophisticated, professionalised and successful doping programme that sport has ever seen”.

The World Anti-Doping Agency and the UCI, cycling’s world governing body, have urged Armstrong to reveal all to the authorities if he is to have any hope of lifting his life ban while also helping them clean up the mess that the sport now finds itself in.

The motives for an admission – revealed by Winfrey – are unclear, but the Texan, who retired from cycling for a second time in 2010, was competing in triathlons until he was banned last year and it is thought it is desire to compete again that motivated his confession.

The Winfrey interview could be just the beginning for Armstrong, with an admission opening him up to a host of possible legal actions.

There are existing suits involving SCA Promotions and The Sunday Times, while the United States Department of Justice could yet join a whistle blower lawsuit filed against Armstrong by former team-mate Floyd Landis.

The False Claims Act lawsuit could see Armstrong forced to repay a substantial sum to the US Government following its sponsorship of cycling through the US Postal Service.

Meanwhile, the UCI is willing to provide an amnesty for those who give evidence to the independent commission on drug use in the sport. The commission, set up by the UCI in October, will investigate if the Governing Body acted appropriately throughout Armstrong’s drug fuelled reign to the top.

WADA and the United States Anti-Doping Agency, the body which investigated and disclosed the misdemeanours in which Lance Armstrong was a central protagonist, believe it is imperative witnesses give evidence “without fear of retribution or retaliation from the UCI”.

© Irish Examiner Ltd. All rights reserved

More in this Section

Arctic Fire burns off rivals to break Grade One duck

Tyson Fury: ‘I’m the first Irish heavyweight champion of the world’

Hennessy Gold Cup delight for Smad Place

Wladimir Klitschko ponders rematch option

You might also like

Breaking Stories

5 things we learned from the Premier League this weekend

Photos: Rugby legend Jonah Lomu remembered at public memorial service

Arsene Wenger defends decision to play Alexis Sanchez at Norwich

Jose Mourinho: Chelsea looking up after impressive display against Spurs


Equal pay for equal work but no country pays men and women the same

Boredom is a key part of creativity and should be explored

BIG READ: Sexism and fear keeping women away from Hollywood's top jobs

Eat your way to an illness free winter

More From The Irish Examiner