DPP will review refusal to prosecute prison officers

The DPP has agreed to review his refusal to prosecute prison officers for perjury concerning an incident where a convicted rapist was assaulted in custody, the High Court has heard.

Because the DPP only agreed by letter last month to conduct that review, seven months after Darius Savickis initiated legal proceedings seeking review, Savickis is entitled to his costs of the proceedings against the DPP, Mr Justice Charles Meenan ruled.

When Savickis initiated his case last May, the DPP could have sent his letter then, which would have ended the case, but that did not happen and instead the court dealt with pre-trial matters and fixed a hearing date for December 7, he said. However, on November 20, the DPP sent a letter which conceded the “whole point” of the case.

Earlier civil proceedings by Savickis seeking damages over the assault were relevant because the High Court and Court of Appeal, “at the very least”, voiced uneasiness and discomfort about some of the evidence given by prison officers, he said.

Savickis’ case was also against the Garda commissioner, who strongly disputed claims a Garda investigation into the alleged perjury was inadequate. Mr Justice Meenan said Savickis was not entitled to costs against the commissioner and those two parties should bear their own costs of that aspect of the case.

Originally from Lithuania, Savickis, aged 47, was assaulted by a prison officer while serving a six-year sentence for orally raping a 23-year-old German woman when she was walking home from work in Galway on November 28, 2005.

In 2016, he was awarded €17,225 by the Court of Appeal over what Mr Justice Gerard Hogan described as a “clear” assault on him by an officer in Castlerea Prison.

It was difficult not to conclude some of the prison officers who gave evidence in Savickis’ earlier civil action before a High Court jury “told lies”, said Mr Justice Hogan.

The jury had awarded Savickis €224 after rejecting most of his claims but finding unreasonable force had been used by the officers. Attributing 95% responsibility to Savickis, the jury reduced its award from €4,500 to €224.

He appealed and the Court of Appeal found he was assaulted and awarded him €10,000, plus €5,000 exemplary damages over the evidence given by the prison officers and €2,225 over the use of unreasonable force.

Last May, Siobhan Phelan, for Savickis, applied to the High Court for permission to bring judicial review proceedings against the DPP and Garda commissioner over the DPP’s March 2017 decision not to prosecute the prison officers for perjury.

Among the claims were the refusal was irrational and the DPP failed to give adequate reasons for it as required under a 2015 EU directive on victims’ rights.

The High Court directed the leave application be heard on notice.

That was ultimately listed for yesterday, when Ms Phelan told Mr Justice Meenan it was not going ahead in light of the DPP’s November 20 letter, and sought her side’s costs.


More in this Section

Hundreds of babies buried on Tuam mother and baby home site may never be detailed

20% of whistleblowers suffer at work as result

Appeals for calm after Blanchardstown shooting

Package of up to €250k agreed for next Garda commissioner


Breaking Stories

Black Santa Sit Out begins charity appeal today

Ryanair pilots threaten Christmas disruption

Lifestyle

Meghan Markle’s sparkle sets the stage for must-have fashion items

Not buying Irish at Christmas costs us dearly

GameTech: B-listers offer plenty of gameplay

Judi Dench branching out into her other passion

More From The Irish Examiner