US asks Hawaii judge to clarify ruling blocking Trump travel ban

The US government is asking a judge to clarify his order blocking President Donald Trump's revised travel ban, arguing it should not apply to a global freeze on refugees entering the country.

A Justice Department motion filed on Friday asks US District Judge Derrick Watson to clarify that the temporary restraining order only applies to the president's temporary ban on travel from six mostly Muslim countries.

Judge Watson issued a 43-page ruling on Wednesday after Hawaii requested he block enforcement of Trump's executive order.

Donald Trump signs the original travel ban.

The government says the ban is a national security measure and critics say it is an unconstitutional and bigoted attempt to bar Muslims from entering the country.

Judge Watson's ruling concluded there was "significant and unrebutted evidence of religious animus" behind the travel ban, including the president's own campaign comments regarding Muslims.

He said Hawaii would suffer financially if the executive order constricted the flow of students and tourists to the state.

In seeking clarification, the Justice Department argued that the lawsuit "failed to meaningfully challenge" another section of Mr Trump's order.

That bars refugees from travelling to the United States for 120 days and caps the number that will be allowed in this fiscal year at 50,000 - a drop of nearly half.

The cap "draws no distinction whatsoever on the basis of religion", government lawyers argue.

Opponents have argued that if that aspect of the ban takes effect, 60,000 people would be stranded in war-torn countries with nowhere else to go.

The Justice Department also argued that the Hawaii ruling should not block Mr Trump's order that security officials review whether other countries are providing enough information to ensure would-be immigrants are not a security threat.

Hawaii believes that the court's order applies to the sections of the executive order mentioned by the government lawyers, said Joshua Wisch, special assistant to Hawaii's attorney general.

"We do not believe the motion is necessary because the court's order was clear. We are drafting a memorandum in opposition that we expect to file soon," he said.

Mr Trump has called the Hawaii ruling an example of "unprecedented judicial overreach" and indicated it will be appealed.

Similar cases are being heard in federal courts in Washington state and Maryland. In all, more than half a dozen states are trying to block the travel ban.


Email Updates

Receive our lunchtime briefing straight to your inbox

More in this Section

Stalls handler dies after suffering serious injuries at Haydock Park

Boots apologises for refusing to cut price of morning-after pill over fear it may encourage its use

Donald Trump 'could benefit from a clean slate,' says Sean Spicer after quitting

Minneapolis police Chief quits after officer shot unarmed woman


Review: U2 - The Joshua Tree, 30th anniversary Super Deluxe Box Set

Let’s be more like Queen Beyoncé online - and keep the rest for ourselves

Ask Audrey: The new girlfriend is mad for us to try make-up sex. Where is a good place to buy make-up?

In the name of love ... Is this U2s biggest fan?

More From The Irish Examiner