US asks Hawaii judge to clarify ruling blocking Trump travel ban

The US government is asking a judge to clarify his order blocking President Donald Trump's revised travel ban, arguing it should not apply to a global freeze on refugees entering the country.

A Justice Department motion filed on Friday asks US District Judge Derrick Watson to clarify that the temporary restraining order only applies to the president's temporary ban on travel from six mostly Muslim countries.

Judge Watson issued a 43-page ruling on Wednesday after Hawaii requested he block enforcement of Trump's executive order.

Donald Trump signs the original travel ban.

The government says the ban is a national security measure and critics say it is an unconstitutional and bigoted attempt to bar Muslims from entering the country.

Judge Watson's ruling concluded there was "significant and unrebutted evidence of religious animus" behind the travel ban, including the president's own campaign comments regarding Muslims.

He said Hawaii would suffer financially if the executive order constricted the flow of students and tourists to the state.

In seeking clarification, the Justice Department argued that the lawsuit "failed to meaningfully challenge" another section of Mr Trump's order.

That bars refugees from travelling to the United States for 120 days and caps the number that will be allowed in this fiscal year at 50,000 - a drop of nearly half.

The cap "draws no distinction whatsoever on the basis of religion", government lawyers argue.

Opponents have argued that if that aspect of the ban takes effect, 60,000 people would be stranded in war-torn countries with nowhere else to go.

The Justice Department also argued that the Hawaii ruling should not block Mr Trump's order that security officials review whether other countries are providing enough information to ensure would-be immigrants are not a security threat.

Hawaii believes that the court's order applies to the sections of the executive order mentioned by the government lawyers, said Joshua Wisch, special assistant to Hawaii's attorney general.

"We do not believe the motion is necessary because the court's order was clear. We are drafting a memorandum in opposition that we expect to file soon," he said.

Mr Trump has called the Hawaii ruling an example of "unprecedented judicial overreach" and indicated it will be appealed.

Similar cases are being heard in federal courts in Washington state and Maryland. In all, more than half a dozen states are trying to block the travel ban.


Email Updates

Receive our lunchtime briefing straight to your inbox

More in this Section

Trump team vows to take travel ban to Supreme Court after latest defeat

FBI 'investigating Jared Kushner's meeting with Russian officials'

Man arrested as anti-terror police carry out new raids in Manchester bomb probe

Cristiano Ronaldo could face tax fraud charges in Spain

Today's Stories

Wifi calling will aid users in mobile phone blackspots


My life in colour - Anne Madden on artistic success and a life in France and Ireland

Ask Audrey - 'There is no such thing as a Kerry man with only small amounts of perspiration'

DNA testing to determine your family history can provide some surprising results

Stay protected this summer with the latest sunscreens

More From The Irish Examiner