Russian flight attendant wins discrimination cases against Aeroflot

A Moscow court has ruled in favour of a flight attendant who claimed Russia's flagship airline Aeroflot took her off long-haul international flights because of her physical appearance.

The Moscow City Court on Wednesday overturned a ruling by a district court that had rejected Yevgeniya Magurina's claim that she was sidelined as part of Aeroflot's drive to make its cabin crews more attractive.

Aeroflot has denied her claims.

Ms Magurina submitted pay slips showing that she stopped receiving bonus pay after she asked for a larger-sized uniform. She says she also no longer was assigned the role of senior steward.

Her legal action brought both support and condemnation, putting the spotlight on how women in modern Russia still are often judged on their looks.

Ms Magurina had requested 500,000 rubles (€7,330) in damages and for the court to rule the company's regulations on clothing sizes discriminatory.

The court upheld her discrimination claim but awarded the flight attendant just 5,000 rubles (€73) in damages.

Her attorney welcomed the ruling, calling it "definitely a victory".

"We were not suing for money. We wanted the court to acknowledge that you cannot treat people like that," lawyer Ksenia Michaylichenko said.

Ms Magurina claimed her experience was part of a broader move that affected hundreds of other flight attendants who faced pay cuts and were taken off the prestigious long-haul flights.

An appeal by another Aeroflot flight attendant who came forward with a similar claim is expected to be heard later this month.

Magurina said a sympathetic manager leaked her documents showing that some 600 of Aeroflot's 7,000 cabin crew employees, most of them women, were reassigned to shorter flights without bonus pay because they were considered too "old, fat and ugly".

Aeroflot denied the claims of discrimination in court, arguing that the company had no obligation to pay bonuses.

But it acknowledged its preference for slimmer cabin crews, arguing that there were objective reasons for it. Aeroflot insisted that overweight attendants could pose a safety risk by blocking emergency exits and require more costly fuel to transport.


Related Articles

Judge sets aside €14k judgement against Donald Trump over planned Doonbeg rock barrier

Court rules Minister cannot appeal Hepatitis C tribunal finding

Woman, 80, sues over fall at Dublin Airport security ahead of €2.5k trip-of-a-lifetime to Vietnam

GSOC probe forces court to delay sentencing of ex-Rihanna security chief accused of harassing garda

More in this Section

Flagship Brexit legislation survives despite mini-rebellion

Yemen blockade leads to Diptheria outbreak, 28 deaths reported

A tick found fossilised in amber is believed to contain dinosaur blood

French President leads efforts to shore up ’fragile’ Paris Climate Accord


Meghan Markle’s sparkle sets the stage for must-have fashion items

Not buying Irish at Christmas costs us dearly

GameTech: B-listers offer plenty of gameplay

Judi Dench branching out into her other passion

More From The Irish Examiner